Suspected oil rogue trader costs company £6 million
An alleged rogue trader who pushed oil prices to an eight-month high is under investigation in London
LONDON - A rogue trader at the London office of PVM Oil Associates, the world's biggest broker of over-the-counter oil derivatives, is suspected of causing $10 million (£6 million) in losses.
Exchange ICE Futures Europe, where the unauthorised trades were placed, is probing the flurry of trading placed in the early hours of Tuesday morning, which pushed the price of Brent crude oil future up above $73 a barrel - the highest level for eight months. In just one hour, 10 times the usual volume of future contracts were exchanged, causing prices to leap by more than $1.50 a barrel in under half an hour at around 2am. Soon after, PVA Oil's computer systems alerted the company about unusual trading patterns. The company immediately notified the Financial Services Authority and began unwinding any unauthorised positions it found.
Robin Bieber, managing director of PVM Oil Futures, said in a statement: "As a result of a series of unauthorised trades, substantial volumes of futures contracts were held by PVM. When this was discovered, the positions were closed in an orderly fashion. PVM expects the highest standards of conduct from its people and takes contraventions of those standards extremely seriously."
The trader responsible has now been confirmed by PVM Oil as Steve Perkins, a senior, long-standing broker at the firm.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos
Long way round: EU banks lament credit spread saga
EBA ditches some of banks’ preferred qualitative reasonings – and shortcuts – for CSRBB exclusion
Iosco chief sees no need for CCPs to hold more capital
CCPs have shown resilience in volatile times without extra skin-in-the-game, says Buenaventura
Banks urge EBA to delay risk benchmarking amid Iran conflict
Risk managers say hypothetical portfolio exercise clashes with severe market turbulence
EU officials tamp down hopes for bank capital relief
Capital cuts are not a done deal in EC’s review of competitiveness, despite US deregulation
EU regulators clash over ceding supervision to Esma
Belgian and Spanish regulators differ on drive for centralised oversight of cross-border firms
Why Trump’s latest Truth should make TradFi twitchy
Wall Street is becoming the villain in US president’s crypto movie
EBA guidance prompts banks to rethink CSRBB perimeters
Banks will likely have to expand their credit spread risk coverage following recommendations