
Deutsche fires two for industrial espionage
Daily news headlines
FRANKFURT - Deutsche Bank has sacked two executives in the wake of an internal investigation into whether Germany's largest bank conducted surveillance on another board member and others.
Regulators, lawyers and the state's Data Protection Authority have now launched their own investigations into whether the bank or its representatives could have broken civil regulations or criminal laws.
Rafael Schenz, the bank's head of German corporate security, was first suspended and has now been dismissed over allegations private detectives he hired to conduct spying on behalf of the bank breached privacy laws.
Wolfram Schmitt, the firm's head of investor relations, was also suspended and is now sacked, reportedly for disclosing confidential shareholder information to the sleuths hired by Schenz.
Allegations of corporate spying are especially controversial in Germany, which has strict privacy laws and is still recovering from East Germany's Cold War legacy of spying and informing on citizens.
The alleged targets of the bank's surveillance included Gerald Hermann, a former member of the bank's supervisory board, who was suspected by the bank of leaking sensitive information.
Michael Bohndorf, an outspoken shareholder who had been critical of the bank's senior management, was also allegedly a target, as was Hermann-Josef Lamberti, the bank's chief operating officer, and German media baron Leo Kirch, who has alleged that remarks by a Deutsche executive led to the failure of one of his companies.
The two dismissals are the result of a probe conducted by law firm Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton on behalf of Deutsche, which began with incidents disclosed in May stemming from events within the bank's corporate security department between 2001 and 2007.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Europe’s lenders sail into uncharted waters of the banking book
Regulators are pushing banks to map their credit spread risk. Here be dragons?
SEC may lack legal clout to impose new dealer rule – Citadel
Adoption of quantitative dealer definition may require congressional changes to US Securities Exchange Act
US Basel endgame hits clearing with op risk capital charges
Dealers also fret about unlevel playing field compared with requirements in the EU
CFTC’s clearing house recovery rule splits industry
Some fear CCPs will fast-track recovery, others say any rule book will be ignored in emergency
EU banks ‘will play for time’ in stand-off over India’s CCPs
Lawyers say banks are unlikely to set up subsidiaries and will instead pin hopes on revised Emir fix
ECB mulls intervention on uneven banking book reporting
Inconsistency among EU banks on whether deposits and loans are in scope for credit spread risk
Iosco warns of leveraged loan ‘vulnerabilities’
As recovery rates plummet, report calls for clearer covenants and more transparency on addbacks
Narrow path to compromise on EU’s post-Brexit clearing rules
Lawmakers unlikely to support industry demand to delete Emir active accounts proposal altogether