CEBS offers technical advice on CAD
New consultation paper published on proposals on options and national discretions in the Capital Requirements Directive
BRUSSELS – The Committee of European Banking Supervisors (CEBS) has begun a public consultation on its proposals on options and national discretions in the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD), as part of developing its response to the European Commission's Call for Technical Advice. The consultation is open to all interested parties, including supervised institutions and other market participants.
The paper sets out CEBS’s preliminary proposals on the future treatment of options and national discretions identified in its supervisory disclosure framework, and some additional provisions that could potentially be construed as national discretions identified by market participants in their responses to CEBS’s public questionnaire. CEBS has already received input on this issue in response to a public questionnaire published on its website and in meetings with market participants. In keeping with the European Commission's better regulation agenda, the preliminary proposals are supported by a high-level impact assessment/cost-benefit analysis.
CEBS is proposing to keep about one-fifth of the 152 provisions covered in its analysis open to national discretion, but also suggests accompanying proposals, where possible, to alleviate any negative side-effects of these national discretions. CEBS notes that more than one-third of these national discretions will expire within a short time. For the other discretions, CEBS is proposing solutions that it believes can bring about further harmonisation of supervisory practices and level the playing field among institutions. Within this group, CEBS is proposing in roughly a quarter of the cases either to keep them or to transform them into supervisory decisions to be implemented and applied case by case. CEBS believes its proposals strike the right balance between the prudential concerns of its members, the flexibility supervisors need to perform their duties, and the interests of domestic and cross-border institutions.
The consultation period is now open and runs until August 15, 2008. Comments should be sent to: cp18@c-ebs.org.
A public hearing will take place on June 17, 2008.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs
FSB chief defends global non-bank regulation drive
Schindler slams ‘misconception’ that regulators intend to impose standardised bank-like rules