
Bank of America deploys 'Ice cream defence' against Cuomo
Losses and Lawsuits
NEW YORK - Bank of America's lawyers have sought the 'ice cream defence' to rebuff a subpoena filed by New York attorney-general Andrew Cuomo to force them to disclose the bonus structure of Merrill Lynch, which Bank of America bought on January 1. Cuomo has called for the release of pay data for the top 200 employees. Bank of America says this data is akin to a trade secret and is calling on the defence used by Carvel's ice cream to prevent it divulging its secret recipe in a 1979 New York lawsuit.
Cuomo's lawyers countered by saying compensation structures have never been trade secrets and are common currency between rival investment banks and recruitment companies.
Cuomo has alleged Merrill Lynch misled Congress about the timing of the bonuses, paid out only days before the finalisation of the Bank of America buyout first agreed in September 2008. Merrill paid out $4 billion in early year-end bonuses in December 2008, contributing to buyer Bank of America's decision to seek $20 billion of US Treasury funding in January 2009 (see OpRisk & Compliance, February 2009). US political and regulatory ire was further stoked by revelations that former Merrill chief executive officer John Thain had spent over $1 million to refurbish his office.
Cuomo has already said he will also subpoena state bailout recipient insurer American International Group after it announced $165 million in fresh executive bonuses. AIG has received a total of $180 billion in state aid since it first teetered on the brink of collapse in 2008.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EU banks ‘will play for time’ in stand-off over India’s CCPs
Lawyers say banks are unlikely to set up subsidiaries and will instead pin hopes on revised Emir fix
ECB mulls intervention on uneven banking book reporting
Inconsistency among EU banks on whether deposits and loans are in scope for credit spread risk
Iosco warns of leveraged loan ‘vulnerabilities’
As recovery rates plummet, report calls for clearer covenants and more transparency on addbacks
Narrow path to compromise on EU’s post-Brexit clearing rules
Lawmakers unlikely to support industry demand to delete Emir active accounts proposal altogether
The Fed’s stress test models are inaccurate. Something has to change
First step for US regulator to improve its bank loss forecasts would be to open up its models to public scrutiny, argue two banking industry advocates
Bankers call for overhaul of EBA stress tests
Support for multiple scenarios, but only if fixed assumptions and variables are scaled back
CFTC plan to relax MMF margin restriction sparks debate
Industry welcomes proposal to lift ban on repo-using funds as eligible IM, but some warn MMFs bring risks
Legal challenges loom for renewed US focus on Sifis
Lawyers say any FSOC attempt to designate systemic non-banks risks a repeat of MetLife case