Credit Suisse hit with £5.6m fine
Systems and controls failings warrant a multimillion-pound fine from the FSA
LONDON – The UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) has fined the UK operations of Credit Suisse £5.6 million for breaching FSA Principles 2 and 3 by failing to conduct their business with due skill, care and diligence, and failing to organise and control their business effectively.
Credit Suisse released its financial results for 2007 on February 12 this year. On February 19, Credit Suisse announced that it had identified mismarking and pricing errors by a small number of traders and that it was repricing certain asset-backed securities. The re-pricing involved a writedown of revenues by $2.65 billion.
The breaches related to the pricing of certain asset-backed securities held by the structured credit group (SCG) within Credit Suisse’s investment banking division. The SCG specialises in complex, high-risk structured products.
FSA Principle 2 states that “a firm must conduct its business with due skill, care and diligence,” while FSA Principle 3 states that “a firm must take reasonable care to organise and control its affairs responsibly and effectively, with adequate risk management systems”. Credit Suisse has been fined for breaching both principles. According to the FSA: “In breach of Principle 2, the [Credit Suisse] subsidiaries failed adequately to supervise the business of the SCG and did not act in a timely way on the concerns they had identified about the pricing of certain asset-backed positions”.
And, “in breach of Principle 3, adequate systems and controls were not put in place by the subsidiaries, which meant that they failed to recognise, for approximately five months, that certain of the SCG’s asset-backed positions were wrongly valued”.
“The penalty reflects our tougher stance on enforcement and our policy of imposing higher penalties to achieve credible deterrence,” says Margaret Cole, director of enforcement at the FSA. “It is imperative, particularly in more challenging financial conditions, that firms have in place appropriate systems and controls to manage their risks. The subsidiaries here failed to take appropriate steps to control the potentially high-risk combination in the structured credit group’s holdings of exotic products, opaque valuations and high leverage.
“The sudden and unexpected announcement of the writedown had the potential to undermine market confidence.”
The subsidiaries co-operated fully with the FSA and agreed to settle at an early stage of the FSA’s investigation. As such, they have qualified for a discount under the FSA’s settlement discount scheme, which the fine of £5.6 million reflects.
Credit Suisse commissioned a detailed review of the causes of the writedown, which identified serious failures in the subsidiaries’ controls over the SCG, and the operation and management of those controls, and concluded they were not effective. Senior management accepted the findings of the review and a comprehensive remedial programme is under way.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
One year on, regulators still want a cure for bank runs
Broad support for higher outflow assumptions on uninsured deposits, but that won’t save insolvent banks
Watchlist and adverse media monitoring solutions 2024: market update and vendor landscape
This Chartis report updates Watchlist monitoring solutions 2022 and focuses on solutions for sanctions (name and transaction) screening and monitoring adverse media and its related elements
Basel Committee reviewing design of liquidity ratios
Focus on LCR and NSFR after Silicon Valley Bank and Credit Suisse, but assumptions may not change
Risk, portfolio margin, regulation: regtech to the rescue
A white paper outlining the complexity of setting the course for risk, margin and regulation
Prop shops recoil from EU’s ‘ill-fitting’ capital regime
Large proprietary trading firms complain they are subject to hand-me-down rules originally designed for banks
Revealed: the three EU banks applying for IMA approval
BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank and Intesa Sanpaolo ask ECB to use internal models for FRTB
FCA presses UK non-banks to put their affairs in order
Greater scrutiny of wind-down plans by regulator could alter capital and liquidity requirements
Industry calls for major rethink of Basel III rules
Isda AGM: Divergence on implementation suggests rules could be flawed, bankers say
Most read
- Basel Committee reviewing design of liquidity ratios
- Breaking out of the cells: banks’ long goodbye to spreadsheets
- Too soon to say good riddance to banks’ public enemy number one