Personal liability for investment officers over fund losses

LOSSES & LAWSUITS

"The New York Court's decision increases the potential for tort claims for fiduciary breach outside the advisory contract. Often, investment management agreements have sweeping limitations on the duties of the manager under the contract, but the court now says that contractual limitations do not preclude tort claims. An investment manager is a fiduciary and owes fiduciary duties to its client beyond its express obligations under the contract. "But the question remains to what extent can an investment manager protect itself by limiting tort claims based on a breach of fiduciary duty through waivers or limitations in the contract?" asks Marzin.

The decision means a fiduciary duty is not only discharged by fulfilling a contract, but a fiduciary relationship can develop in the parties' ongoing conduct, and could require performance of more than just contractual duties. It also makes breach of fiduciary duty a tort, rather than just breach of contract, and officers can be held personally liable for tortuous behaviour on the job.

  • LinkedIn  
  • Save this article
  • Print this page  

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: