
Warnings issued over Man-in-the-Phone fraud attacks
Daily news headlines
LONDON - Ever-resourceful fraudsters have developed a new technique to gain access to personal consumer bank information. Man-in-the-Phone fraud attacks involve the fraudster calling the customer impersonating a bank representative to inform them that their savings, checking or card account may have been breached or compromised.
The fraudster advises the customer that in order to remedy the situation they should remain on the line and verify a few account details. At the same time, the fraudster initiates a call to the customer's bank and connects the customer with a real bank representative while the fraudster remains muted on the line. The bank requests authentication information, such as social security number, passwords and other personal information, which is then provided by the customer. Once the personal information is provided, the fraudster quickly ends the conference line and informs the customer that the issue has been resolved. Meanwhile, with the personal information gathered during the call, the fraudster can take over the customer's phone banking relationship and transfer money out of the customer's accounts.
"We help many of the largest retail banks, investment banks and brokerage firms protect themselves and their clients from all types of cross-channel fraud attacks," says Paul Henninger, director of fraud solutions at Actimize. "With our unique perspective into the operations of financial institutions around the world, we can spot trends as they occur. We've noticed an accelerating trend in Man-in-the-Phone attacks. We hope that by publicising this new trend, we can help reduce its impact on individuals and our banking clients."
Actimize recommends that banking customers never share account or personal information with anyone that calls and requests to 'verify' banking credentials. Customers should always tell such callers that they will call the bank to provide such information using the bank's phone number listed on the back of an ATM, debit or credit card. While this sounds obvious, many consumers do not take this simple precaution. The vendor also recommends banks combine cross channel behaviour profiling and anomaly detection technologies with better call centre processes and training. Call centre employees should be trained to listen more closely and ask who originated the call. Attacks may be thwarted or losses minimised if bank employees ask simple (but random instead of static) security questions at various points in the phone conversation when confirming personal credentials. Fraudsters are less likely to trick customers into sharing answers to several security questions.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Europe’s lenders sail into uncharted waters of the banking book
Regulators are pushing banks to map their credit spread risk. Here be dragons?
SEC may lack legal clout to impose new dealer rule – Citadel
Adoption of quantitative dealer definition may require congressional changes to US Securities Exchange Act
US Basel endgame hits clearing with op risk capital charges
Dealers also fret about unlevel playing field compared with requirements in the EU
CFTC’s clearing house recovery rule splits industry
Some fear CCPs will fast-track recovery, others say any rule book will be ignored in emergency
EU banks ‘will play for time’ in stand-off over India’s CCPs
Lawyers say banks are unlikely to set up subsidiaries and will instead pin hopes on revised Emir fix
ECB mulls intervention on uneven banking book reporting
Inconsistency among EU banks on whether deposits and loans are in scope for credit spread risk
Iosco warns of leveraged loan ‘vulnerabilities’
As recovery rates plummet, report calls for clearer covenants and more transparency on addbacks
Narrow path to compromise on EU’s post-Brexit clearing rules
Lawmakers unlikely to support industry demand to delete Emir active accounts proposal altogether