US enhances enforcement and investor protection
House approves measure to enhance SEC enforcement and investor protection
WASHINGTON, DC – The US House of Representatives has passed legislation that will provide new investor protection and bolster the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) enforcement programme.
The Securities Act, 2008, sponsored by republican Paul Kanjorski with bipartisan support from House Financial Services Committee chairman Barney Frank and ranking member Spencer Bachus, incorporates recommendations made by the SEC to Congress to enhance the securities laws and give the SEC’s Enforcement Division increased flexibility and resources to pursue securities fraudsters and other wrongdoers in the markets.
“This bill provides new protections for investors during a very tumultuous time in our markets,” says Bachus. “The Securities Act strengthens investor protection, enhances capital markets competitiveness and increases the SEC’s effectiveness. It will prevent bad actors from moving throughout the securities industry to perpetuate fraud and provide the commission with new tools to help injured investors. Regulators will have to make financial reporting more understandable and ensure that our capital markets can compete on a level playing field with their foreign counterparts.”
SEC chairman Christopher Cox applauds the move. “Policing the markets and keeping investors’ money safe has never been more important, and so this legislation comes at a critical time,” he says.
Under Cox, the SEC’s enforcement staff has increased to 34% of the SEC workforce from 32% in 2005 and 29% in the 1990s. This investment in investor protection has paid dividends. In the past three years, the SEC has achieved the greatest number of corporate penalties in any year in SEC history, the second highest number of enforcement actions brought in a single year, and the second highest single-year total for penalties and disgorgements. The SEC claims the Securities Act will help it to further strengthen this record through the “elimination of duplication and extraneous responsibilities for SEC enforcement staff in their pursuit of wrongdoers, by giving the SEC authority to obtain financial penalties from wrongdoers in administrative proceedings without needing to file a separate civil action in federal court”.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Foreign banks can swerve US Basel op risk capital charges
New proposal offers category III and IV banks op-out from regime, but intragroup trades penalised
BoE’s Bailey expects global consensus on FRTB internal models
Isda AGM: UK is reviewing proposals from US and EU regulators before finalising its IMA rules
DRW chief slams ‘ridiculous’ OCC stablecoin rule
Isda AGM: Wilson warns week-long redemption freeze would deter use of Genius Act coins as cash leg of tokenised repo
Dealers push for more revisions to Basel III endgame
Isda AGM: Goldman, JP Morgan bankers want changes on cross-product netting, CVA and default risk charges
StanChart: UK, EU should copy US ‘commercial’ Basel III
Isda AGM: Exec warns divergent Basel III rules will push trading into less-regulated entities
NBFI oversight ‘no longer adequate’, say BdF economists
Researchers call for stronger supervision of non-bank sector ‘before risks actually materialise’
Why Brexit still stirs up trouble for cross-border business
As EU erects another obstacle, banks consider ways around it – or exit strategies
Can US regulators keep Collins happy with one capital stack?
Legal experts say Basel III endgame redraft retains spirit if not letter of the floor