IIF report shows banks making changes to pay structures
The banking industry is acting together to assure regulators it recognises the need for reform of compensation structures to be more long-term, risk-based
Washington DC - Financial services firms are moving forward with far-reaching changes in their approaches to employee compensation, according to a new report from the Institute of International Finance (IIF).
Firms are proceeding with reforms that are both in line with the principles published by the IIF in July 2008 and by the Financial Stability Forum that said its principles "aim to ensure effective governance of compensation, alignment of compensation with prudent risk taking, and effective supervisory oversight and stakeholder engagement in compensation".
Josef Ackermann, chairman of the IIF board of directors, chairman of the management board and the group executive committee of Deutsche Bank, said: "The message today is that progress is being made in reforming compensation in firms across our industry. The leading edge of these efforts reflects the first of the IIF's principles, which stresses that compensation incentives should be based on actual performance and should be aligned with shareholder interests and long-term, firm-wide profitability, taking into account overall risk and the cost of capital."
Last summer the IIF published a comprehensive report highlighting needed industry reforms in a range of areas including compensation (Final Report of the IIF Committee on Market Best Practices). On Monday, March 30, the IIF released a report on compensation practices carried out by consultancy firm Oliver Wyman comprised of a survey of financial services firms, which includes corporate and institutional banking sectors, and interviews with senior industry executives at a range of firms. The report found wide agreement that compensation incentives should not induce risk-taking in excess of the firm's own risk appetite, and significant support for the view that compensation should include a component reflecting the firm's overall results in line with sound risk management and business goals.
Ackermann said: "The industry broadly recognises that compensation structures in the past had shortcomings. It is necessary for firms to put in place practices that are more appropriately aligned to the current and prospective needs of our industry and to the exigencies of market stability. The IIF's principles are unique in their global emphasis and scope, and have been endorsed by senior executives from major firms from a large number of countries. They established benchmarks for the industry, and we are pleased to note the recent announcements of principles for compensation by key regulatory and supervisory bodies that are broadly consistent with those of the IIF."
Klaus-Peter Mueller, chairman of the supervisory board, Commerzbank, and co-chairman of the steering committee said: "The majority of firms surveyed are moving towards full alignment with the seven principles set out by the IIF Committee on Market Best Practices in its 2008 report, and they are doing so on an urgent basis. The consensus around the direction of change in industry compensation practices is unprecedented, and provides a solid basis for the initiatives underway in the financial services industry."
The IIF said a lot of work still remains to be done to fully reform compensation structures, but it noted that this report showed a number of firms have already developed systematic approaches towards reflecting risk in performance measurement, handling deferred compensation mechanisms and establishing sound governance standards for the overall compensation process.
As the process of reform moves forward throughout the industry, the problem of "first-mover disadvantage", or the risk that the first firms to introduce new compensation schemes will lose talent, is diminished.
Click here for the survey.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Industry calls for major rethink of Basel III rules
Isda AGM: Divergence on implementation suggests rules could be flawed, bankers say
Saudi Arabia poised to become clean netting jurisdiction
Isda AGM: Netting regulation awaiting final approvals from regulators
Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
Isda AGM: All in-scope banks opt for standardised approach to market risk; Nomura eyes IMA in 2025
CFTC chair backs easing of G-Sib surcharge in Basel endgame
Isda AGM: Fed’s proposed surcharge changes could hike client clearing cost by 80%
UK investment firms feeling the heat on prudential rules
Signs firms are falling behind FCA’s expectations on wind-down and liquidity risk management
The American way: a stress-test substitute for Basel’s IRRBB?
Bankers divided over new CCAR scenario designed to bridge supervisory gap exposed by SVB failure
Industry warns CFTC against rushing to regulate AI for trading
Vote on workplan pulled amid calls to avoid duplicating rules from other regulatory agencies
Bank of Communications moves early to meet TLAC requirements
China Construction Bank becomes last China G-Sib to release TLAC plans
Most read
- Top 10 operational risks for 2024
- Top 10 op risks: third parties stoke cyber risk
- Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites