FSA criticises subprime industry
UK subprime lenders have risk management issues, say FSA
The Financial Services Agency (FSA), the UK industry regulator, has found that lenders and intermediaries inadequately assessed and monitored their subprime loan customers.
Clive Briault, managing director of retail markets at the FSA, says: "We are very concerned about these findings. Consumers in the subprime market are vulnerable people who may have high debts or a bad credit history. It is therefore important that they are properly assessed and advised.”
In a review published today, the FSA said that intermediaries:• inadequately assessed consumers’ ability to afford the mortgage in a third of the 485 cases;• inadequately assessed suitability in almost half of the cases.
The FSA was also concerned about the practice of customers self-certifying their income, which occurred in the majority of cases.
The agency said none of the lenders it reviewed had covered all of the responsible lending considerations in their policies, and that in some cases the policies in place were not adhered to. Lenders also failed to look at how these policies were applied, which the FSA said “resulted in the approval of potentially unaffordable mortgages”.
The review looks at the practices of 34 intermediaries and 11 lenders, of which five will face further investigation by the enforcement division of the agency.
The FSA said it would continue to monitor the sub-prime market.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
ECB bank supervisors want top-down stress test that bites
Proposal would simplify capital structure with something similar to US stress capital buffer
Clearing houses warn Esma margin rules will stifle innovation
Changes in model confidence levels could still trip supervisory threshold even after relaxation in final RTS
BlackRock, Citadel Securities, Nasdaq mull tokenised equities’ impact on regulations
An SEC panel recently debated the ramifications of a future with tokenised equities
CCPs trade blows over EU’s new open access push
Cboe Clear wants more interoperability; Euronext says ‘not with us’
Who is Selig? CFTC pick is smart and social, but some say too green
Colleagues praise crypto smarts and collegial style, but views on prediction markets and funding trouble Senate
EU single portal faces battle to unify cyber incident reporting
Digital omnibus package accused of lacking ambition to truly streamline notification requirements
Basel Committee members ‘buying time’ before fixing FRTB mess
Despite inconsistencies today, regulators maintain they want to align global regime eventually
How Basel III endgame will reshape banks’ business mix
B3E will affect portfolio focus and client strategy, says capital risk strategist