FSA criticises subprime industry
UK subprime lenders have risk management issues, say FSA
The Financial Services Agency (FSA), the UK industry regulator, has found that lenders and intermediaries inadequately assessed and monitored their subprime loan customers.
Clive Briault, managing director of retail markets at the FSA, says: "We are very concerned about these findings. Consumers in the subprime market are vulnerable people who may have high debts or a bad credit history. It is therefore important that they are properly assessed and advised.”
In a review published today, the FSA said that intermediaries:• inadequately assessed consumers’ ability to afford the mortgage in a third of the 485 cases;• inadequately assessed suitability in almost half of the cases.
The FSA was also concerned about the practice of customers self-certifying their income, which occurred in the majority of cases.
The agency said none of the lenders it reviewed had covered all of the responsible lending considerations in their policies, and that in some cases the policies in place were not adhered to. Lenders also failed to look at how these policies were applied, which the FSA said “resulted in the approval of potentially unaffordable mortgages”.
The review looks at the practices of 34 intermediaries and 11 lenders, of which five will face further investigation by the enforcement division of the agency.
The FSA said it would continue to monitor the sub-prime market.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Erba myth: will US banks choose new capital measure?
B3E gives US banks a dilemma – adopt expanded risk-based approach, or a new standardised alternative
Illiquid assets pricing still needs expert judgement, say banks
EU regulators want more transparency in valuations, but some asset prices remain elusive
Fed to move tailored-capital goalposts soon, says Bowman
Banks hope agencies will index triggers for harsher capital rules to economic growth
Will SEC reporting proposal supercharge alt data providers?
Move that would allow companies to opt out of quarterly reporting disclosures welcomed
EU lawmaker calls for review of Luxembourg’s cross-border rules
Grand Duchy accused of side-stepping rules aimed at prising away banking business from London
Un-American or un-JPM? Surcharge rethink divides G-Sibs
Some see sense in rethink to funding indicator, others call for a backtrack
Bank of England softens tone on CCP cross-product margining
Breeden supports margin efficiencies to encourage more repo clearing, but still warns on leverage
UK securitisation reforms trump EU’s, say market players
Originators and investors could find UK securitised assets easier to deal with after tandem reviews