NASD charges Oppenheimer and CEO Lowenthal
LOSSES & LAWSUITS
NEW YORK – In early January, the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) charged Oppenheimer and its chief executive, Albert Lowenthal, with knowingly submitting inaccurate and incomplete data in response to NASD's request that the firm perform a self-assessment of its mutual fund breakpoint discount practices.
This is the second time in eight months that NASD has charged the firm with failing to produce documents and information requested by NASD. The first complaint, issued in May 2005, involved an investigation of municipal bond transaction reporting violations.
"All regulated firms have a fundamental obligation to co-operate with NASD requests for information by providing complete, accurate and responsive data in a timely manner," says Barry Goldsmith, NASD executive vice-president and head of enforcement.
"The ability of NASD and other securities regulators to protect investors and police the markets depends upon compliance with that obligation. Today's matter is especially troubling not only because of the firm's repeated lack of co-operation with NASD, but more significantly because, as stated in the complaint, the CEO himself allegedly directed the firm to provide NASD with information he knew to be inaccurate" Goldsmith said.
In March 2003, a report jointly issued by NASD and other securities regulators showed that nearly one in three mutual fund transactions in front-end load mutual funds that appeared eligible for a breakpoint discount did not receive one.
As a result of those findings, NASD required approximately 2,000 broker-dealers that sold front-end load mutual funds during 2001-2002 – including Oppenheimer – to conduct a self-assessment of their compliance with mutual fund breakpoint discount requirements and report the results to NASD. As a result of the breakpoint sweep and ensuing NASD enforcement actions, more than $130 million has been returned to investors who did not receive appropriate breakpoint discounts.
In another matter involving Oppenheimer, NASD announced that it censured and fined the firm $250,000 for at least 230 late disclosures of reportable information about its brokers, including customer complaints, regulatory actions and investigations, and terminations. Reportable information on all registered brokers is maintained in NASD's Central Registration Depository and is available free of charge to the public through NASD's BrokerCheck.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Banks will not be frowned upon for discount window borrowing – Fed official
Risk Live: more banks have completed paperwork to access Fed lending facility than a year ago
Capital One puts OCC’s tough stance on mergers to the test
Proposed Discover deal should be approved but will go under the microscope, ex-regulators say
As FCMs dwindle, regulators fear systemic risk
Panellists highlight dangers of clearing membership becoming more concentrated
EU banks fear green asset ratios paint an unfair picture
Industry lobbyist clashes with lawmaker over usefulness of new sustainability disclosure
EU watchdogs to launch prop trader capital review in April
Prop traders say bank-style IFR rules are driving them out, but doubt EBA will suggest changes
Investors say new SEC disclosures may sit on shelf
Advisory committee questions value of rule 605 changes, even for retail investors
CFTC hears ‘call to action’ from swaps end-users on Basel III
Commissioner Pham mulls engaging with prudential regulators over capital hit on clearing
Iosco gears up for ‘intensive work’ on AI regulation
Watchdogs risk ‘falling behind the curve’, secretary-general warns; FSB also working on guidance
Most read
- Top 10 operational risks for 2024
- As FCMs dwindle, regulators fear systemic risk
- Top 10 op risks: AI fears drive cyber risk to record high