
Regulation: quality, not quantity please
Editor's Letter

Regulatory reform is grabbing the headlines - there is quite a bit for everyone to think about. Already, some individuals and associations are saying no real reform is needed. Others are calling for the complete overhaul of the supervision as we know it. Some feel immediate action is called for, while others are counselling a more 'wait and see' approach. The politics of retribution threatens to overwhelm in some places.
So, in the spirit of my usual frankness, I'd like to put some random thoughts to the collective OpRisk & Compliance community on the topic of regulatory reform:
First, risk management failed, people failed, systems and controls failed. But what happened over the past two years was also the collapse of a classic liquidity bubble - reading about John Law's remarkable Mississippi Bubble or indeed the South Sea Bubble raises all sorts of mental comparisons from an economic and monetary policy perspective (... and I'm not saying all bankers are crooks!!). Regulators must look at the bigger picture and figure out how to balance financial innovation and systemic stability - and that is really the basis on which any attempts to reform the global financial framework should begin.
Therefore, global financial framework reform must begin at the very top - I think a nightmare scenario would be where individual countries each set off on their own paths and we wind up with a rising protectionist tide in financial services. Financial innovation must be allowed to continue, but we should also understand how to nurture it and give it boundaries. As part of this, regulators need to set parameters around how banks grow businesses - firms must be encouraged to invest in infrastructure and talent if they won't adopt best practices of their own free will. Airlines and pharmaceutical companies have aspects of their operations tightly defined by regulation because of the consequences of "getting it wrong". The current crisis shows just how much everybody pays if the banks get it wrong.
I would argue, however, that instead of 'more' regulation, in many cases what's needed is 'better' regulation. And governments need to invest in their regulators to ensure laws and rules are implemented properly.
Over time, I think we'll find that analysing what went wrong will prove to be the easy bit. Fixing the system - from the top, down - will prove to be infinitely more challenging.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Regulators’ remorse: SVB and the case for IRRBB capital charges
Basel Committee chair among those who say Pillar 1 capital requirement could have helped control SVB risks
Basel’s IRRBB shock scenario update hit by US crisis
Recalibration of shocks had been touted for Q3, but wider rethink may now cause delay
HKMA launches consultation on green taxonomy
Regulator could use proposal to assess progress of banks towards climate goals
After SVB downfall, EBA stress test seeks out unrealised losses
European regulator asks for data on the fair value and sensitivity of bonds and their hedges
EU banks fear Brexit battle over FRTB internal models
Bank of England approach looks easier, but that may not make much difference to model uptake
Europe’s new IRRBB test: the riddle with no answer
A proposed compromise on net interest income test is not scientific, but exact calibration may be impossible
Eurex clearing chief calls for active account carve-outs
Isda AGM: Müller says EU clearing thresholds should exempt market-making and US client trades
The regulator that troubleshoots first, asks questions later
Canada’s bank watchdog aims to intervene early to tackle burgeoning risks, even at the expense of “perfect” regulatory decisions