Business change threatens financial integrity
Research finds M&A activity the primary cause of financial “fault lines”
Change due to mergers and acquisitions activity is undermining the integrity of firms’ financial systems, according to new independent research commissioned by ACL Services.
Of the 300 companies from north America, the UK and Germany surveyed, 52% had either merged, been acquired or undergone a departmental merger in the past 12 months. While 85% of businesses experienced some level of change in their financial analysis applications over the past 12 months, almost half of respondents (47%) believed their financial systems were undermined by operational change within the business.
One in three businesses stated they were exposed to regular finance department errors and two-thirds are seeking to improve the effectiveness of financial transaction analysis. Some 40% of respondents agreed they struggle to find a balance between optimal internal controls versus over-controlled systems that can’t keep pace with business.
“It appears that enterprise financial systems and processes are buckling under the pressure of constant change,” says Harald Will, president and CEO of ACL Services. “Even seemingly simple changes to business structures, such as the merger of a department or a move to a shared services centre, can involve massive financial consolidation and upheaval. Constant change equals greater risk and businesses need to have much tighter systems and monitoring in place to manage both.”
Businesses are already feeling the potential financial pitfalls brought about by change. About 13% of companies admitted to experiencing financial loss due to poor risk management, 12% had been asked to improve their processes by regulators and 5% had already been fined for deficient compliance controls. Perhaps as a response to this, one in three businesses stated their approach to assessing risk had changed in the past 12 months.
Continuous monitoring could be one way to mitigate these risks but, although 59% of respondents agreed that continuous monitoring of financial transactions across their organisation is an effective way to mitigate risk and improve accuracy, only 17% of businesses have continuous controls monitoring technology in place.
“Small gaps and weaknesses create ‘fault lines’ that potentially destabilise an organization’s financial systems. And while businesses agree that continuous auditing is an effective strategy to mitigate these risks and bridge systems, they are still using ad hoc analysis in most cases. As they try to cope with the impact of change, they must invest in early warning systems to continuously monitor the fault lines for fraud, mistakes and inefficiencies that can cost millions in losses, as well as damage a company’s reputation and value,” says Will.
The ACL survey was undertaken by Loudhouse Research, an independent B2B research consultancy, in July 2007.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Prop shops recoil from EU’s ‘ill-fitting’ capital regime
Large proprietary trading firms complain they are subject to hand-me-down rules originally designed for banks
Revealed: the three EU banks applying for IMA approval
BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank and Intesa Sanpaolo ask ECB to use internal models for FRTB
FCA presses UK non-banks to put their affairs in order
Greater scrutiny of wind-down plans by regulator could alter capital and liquidity requirements
Industry calls for major rethink of Basel III rules
Isda AGM: Divergence on implementation suggests rules could be flawed, bankers say
Saudi Arabia poised to become clean netting jurisdiction
Isda AGM: Netting regulation awaiting final approvals from regulators
Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
Isda AGM: All in-scope banks opt for standardised approach to market risk; Nomura eyes IMA in 2025
CFTC chair backs easing of G-Sib surcharge in Basel endgame
Isda AGM: Fed’s proposed surcharge changes could hike client clearing cost by 80%
UK investment firms feeling the heat on prudential rules
Signs firms are falling behind FCA’s expectations on wind-down and liquidity risk management