
Business change threatens financial integrity
Daily news headlines
Change due to mergers and acquisitions activity is undermining the integrity of firms’ financial systems, according to new independent research commissioned by ACL Services.
Of the 300 companies from north America, the UK and Germany surveyed, 52% had either merged, been acquired or undergone a departmental merger in the past 12 months. While 85% of businesses experienced some level of change in their financial analysis applications over the past 12 months, almost half of respondents (47%) believed their financial systems were undermined by operational change within the business.
One in three businesses stated they were exposed to regular finance department errors and two-thirds are seeking to improve the effectiveness of financial transaction analysis. Some 40% of respondents agreed they struggle to find a balance between optimal internal controls versus over-controlled systems that can’t keep pace with business.
“It appears that enterprise financial systems and processes are buckling under the pressure of constant change,” says Harald Will, president and CEO of ACL Services. “Even seemingly simple changes to business structures, such as the merger of a department or a move to a shared services centre, can involve massive financial consolidation and upheaval. Constant change equals greater risk and businesses need to have much tighter systems and monitoring in place to manage both.”
Businesses are already feeling the potential financial pitfalls brought about by change. About 13% of companies admitted to experiencing financial loss due to poor risk management, 12% had been asked to improve their processes by regulators and 5% had already been fined for deficient compliance controls. Perhaps as a response to this, one in three businesses stated their approach to assessing risk had changed in the past 12 months.
Continuous monitoring could be one way to mitigate these risks but, although 59% of respondents agreed that continuous monitoring of financial transactions across their organisation is an effective way to mitigate risk and improve accuracy, only 17% of businesses have continuous controls monitoring technology in place.
“Small gaps and weaknesses create ‘fault lines’ that potentially destabilise an organization’s financial systems. And while businesses agree that continuous auditing is an effective strategy to mitigate these risks and bridge systems, they are still using ad hoc analysis in most cases. As they try to cope with the impact of change, they must invest in early warning systems to continuously monitor the fault lines for fraud, mistakes and inefficiencies that can cost millions in losses, as well as damage a company’s reputation and value,” says Will.
The ACL survey was undertaken by Loudhouse Research, an independent B2B research consultancy, in July 2007.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
US banks race against time as Fed plays climate catch-up
Long-awaited US climate risk exercise puts tough pressure on banks’ data and models
EU banks need ‘billions’ in hedges to pass new NII test
Declines in net interest income can be hedged, but the markets may struggle to handle the demand
CFTC chair gloomy over crypto legislation prospects
FIA Boca 2023: Behnam also asks Congress to grant more powers to regulate third-party tech providers
Missing Basel metric could have revealed SVB risks
US regulators did not implement economic value of equity test that SVB failed in 2021
Strict term SOFR trading rules ‘permanent’ says Fed’s Bowman
Official says restrictions on use of term SOFR swaps “should not be expected to change”
Esma still wants more tools to tackle clearing crises
Even after Emir 3 draft, EU regulator would like more powers over both foreign and domestic CCPs
Club rules? How German retail trading venues shut out PTFs
Murky rule books prevent non-bank market-makers from competing for Europe’s growing online customer demand
Regulated UK crypto firms fear authorisation Groundhog Day
Industry wants grandfathering in new Treasury framework to avoid business continuity risk