Business change threatens financial integrity
Research finds M&A activity the primary cause of financial “fault lines”
Change due to mergers and acquisitions activity is undermining the integrity of firms’ financial systems, according to new independent research commissioned by ACL Services.
Of the 300 companies from north America, the UK and Germany surveyed, 52% had either merged, been acquired or undergone a departmental merger in the past 12 months. While 85% of businesses experienced some level of change in their financial analysis applications over the past 12 months, almost half of respondents (47%) believed their financial systems were undermined by operational change within the business.
One in three businesses stated they were exposed to regular finance department errors and two-thirds are seeking to improve the effectiveness of financial transaction analysis. Some 40% of respondents agreed they struggle to find a balance between optimal internal controls versus over-controlled systems that can’t keep pace with business.
“It appears that enterprise financial systems and processes are buckling under the pressure of constant change,” says Harald Will, president and CEO of ACL Services. “Even seemingly simple changes to business structures, such as the merger of a department or a move to a shared services centre, can involve massive financial consolidation and upheaval. Constant change equals greater risk and businesses need to have much tighter systems and monitoring in place to manage both.”
Businesses are already feeling the potential financial pitfalls brought about by change. About 13% of companies admitted to experiencing financial loss due to poor risk management, 12% had been asked to improve their processes by regulators and 5% had already been fined for deficient compliance controls. Perhaps as a response to this, one in three businesses stated their approach to assessing risk had changed in the past 12 months.
Continuous monitoring could be one way to mitigate these risks but, although 59% of respondents agreed that continuous monitoring of financial transactions across their organisation is an effective way to mitigate risk and improve accuracy, only 17% of businesses have continuous controls monitoring technology in place.
“Small gaps and weaknesses create ‘fault lines’ that potentially destabilise an organization’s financial systems. And while businesses agree that continuous auditing is an effective strategy to mitigate these risks and bridge systems, they are still using ad hoc analysis in most cases. As they try to cope with the impact of change, they must invest in early warning systems to continuously monitor the fault lines for fraud, mistakes and inefficiencies that can cost millions in losses, as well as damage a company’s reputation and value,” says Will.
The ACL survey was undertaken by Loudhouse Research, an independent B2B research consultancy, in July 2007.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Will Iosco’s guidance solve pre-hedging puzzle?
Buy-siders doubt consent requirement will remove long-standing concerns
Responsible AI is about payoffs as much as principles
How one firm cut loan processing times and improved fraud detection without compromising on governance
Could one-off loan losses at US regional banks become systemic?
Investors bet Zions, Western Alliance are isolated problems, but credit risk managers are nervous
SEC poised to approve expansion of CME-FICC cross-margining
Agency’s new division heads moving swiftly on applications related to US Treasury clearing
ECB bank supervisors want top-down stress test that bites
Proposal would simplify capital structure with something similar to US stress capital buffer
Clearing houses warn Esma margin rules will stifle innovation
Changes in model confidence levels could still trip supervisory threshold even after relaxation in final RTS
BlackRock, Citadel Securities, Nasdaq mull tokenised equities’ impact on regulations
An SEC panel recently debated the ramifications of a future with tokenised equities
CCPs trade blows over EU’s new open access push
Cboe Clear wants more interoperability; Euronext says ‘not with us’