Business change threatens financial integrity
Research finds M&A activity the primary cause of financial “fault lines”
Change due to mergers and acquisitions activity is undermining the integrity of firms’ financial systems, according to new independent research commissioned by ACL Services.
Of the 300 companies from north America, the UK and Germany surveyed, 52% had either merged, been acquired or undergone a departmental merger in the past 12 months. While 85% of businesses experienced some level of change in their financial analysis applications over the past 12 months, almost half of respondents (47%) believed their financial systems were undermined by operational change within the business.
One in three businesses stated they were exposed to regular finance department errors and two-thirds are seeking to improve the effectiveness of financial transaction analysis. Some 40% of respondents agreed they struggle to find a balance between optimal internal controls versus over-controlled systems that can’t keep pace with business.
“It appears that enterprise financial systems and processes are buckling under the pressure of constant change,” says Harald Will, president and CEO of ACL Services. “Even seemingly simple changes to business structures, such as the merger of a department or a move to a shared services centre, can involve massive financial consolidation and upheaval. Constant change equals greater risk and businesses need to have much tighter systems and monitoring in place to manage both.”
Businesses are already feeling the potential financial pitfalls brought about by change. About 13% of companies admitted to experiencing financial loss due to poor risk management, 12% had been asked to improve their processes by regulators and 5% had already been fined for deficient compliance controls. Perhaps as a response to this, one in three businesses stated their approach to assessing risk had changed in the past 12 months.
Continuous monitoring could be one way to mitigate these risks but, although 59% of respondents agreed that continuous monitoring of financial transactions across their organisation is an effective way to mitigate risk and improve accuracy, only 17% of businesses have continuous controls monitoring technology in place.
“Small gaps and weaknesses create ‘fault lines’ that potentially destabilise an organization’s financial systems. And while businesses agree that continuous auditing is an effective strategy to mitigate these risks and bridge systems, they are still using ad hoc analysis in most cases. As they try to cope with the impact of change, they must invest in early warning systems to continuously monitor the fault lines for fraud, mistakes and inefficiencies that can cost millions in losses, as well as damage a company’s reputation and value,” says Will.
The ACL survey was undertaken by Loudhouse Research, an independent B2B research consultancy, in July 2007.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs
FSB chief defends global non-bank regulation drive
Schindler slams ‘misconception’ that regulators intend to impose standardised bank-like rules