Paulson pitches rescue deal to House committee
Regulators in for a tough ride when they pitch the Paulson Plan to the House Financial Services Committee
WASHINGTON, DC – US Treasury secretary Henry Paulson and chairman of the Federal Reserve Ben Bernanke will present their solution to the recent financial crisis – the Troubled Asset Relief Programme, also dubbed the Paulson Plan – to the House Financial Services Committee later today.
The regulators fielded tough questions on the bailout plan from the Senate Banking Committee yesterday over concerns regarding its implications for taxpayers and homeowners, but today’s hearing is predicted to be much more hostile. Barney Frank, chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, agrees action should be taken, but wants to make banks pay for their mistakes. He wants to save homeowners by allowing bankruptcy judges to force lenders to change the terms of mortgages on primary residences, while punishing banks by legislating on executive pay.
An issue likely to emerge again today is the inclusion of warrants in the plan that would convert Treasury investment in illiquid assets into equity in the companies helped. Yesterday Paulson stated this would not be advisable because he believed it would limit participation in the programme, causing it to fail in its aim of getting the market moving again.
The issue of legislating on executives’ pay, which both US presidential candidates have called for, might be a sticking point that Congress will need to reach a compromise on.
The call for regulation of the $58 trillion credit default swaps market by members of the Senate committee is also likely to be echoed today.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EU officials tamp down hopes for bank capital relief
Capital cuts are not a done deal in EC’s review of competitiveness, despite US deregulation
EU regulators clash over ceding supervision to Esma
Belgian and Spanish regulators differ on drive for centralised oversight of cross-border firms
Why Trump’s latest Truth should make TradFi twitchy
Wall Street is becoming the villain in US president’s crypto movie
EBA guidance prompts banks to rethink CSRBB perimeters
Banks will likely have to expand their credit spread risk coverage following recommendations
Market players warn against European repo clearing mandate
Regulators urged to await outcome of US mandate and be wary of risks to government bond liquidity
Esma won’t soften regulatory expectations for cloud and AI
CCP supervisory chair signals heightened scrutiny of third-party risk and operational resilience
BPI says SR 11-7 should go; bank model risk chiefs say ‘no’
Lobby group wants US guidance repealed; practitioners want consistent model supervision and audit
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision