FSA facing compensation claim
The UK regulator is facing claims it failed to halt activities of a suspected rogue trader
LONDON - The UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) is facing a multimillion-pound compensation claim from a group of investors who allege the regulator allowed GFX Capital Markets to continue trading even though they had serious concerns about its head Terry Freeman, according to reports in The Times.
GFX Capital Markets collapsed with losses around £44 million late last year, with more than 800 investors losing money. Even though Freeman blamed administrative problems, sources suggest there are elements of a Ponzi scheme - paying high returns with money from other clients' capital.
Disgruntled investors are claiming that the FSA was suspicious of Freeman yet failed to act until it was too late. According to the report in the The Times, FSA officials had gathered intelligence on Freeman, a foreign exchange trader, for more than two years, and knew he had changed his name from Terence Sparks after being disqualified as a director until 2012 in response to a conviction in March 1997.
However, Freeman set up GFX in 2004. Several reports are alleged to have been made to the FSA concerning issues surrounding Freeman's business practices between 2004 and 2007. In a letter to the FSA, BSG Solicitors, representing the investors, state: "The FSA was in a unique position, and had various opportunities, to bring Mr Freeman's dealings to a halt and thus significantly reduce the financial decline that my clients' investments were subjected to."
Freeman, who is on police bail, protests his innocence. The FSA refused to comment on an ongoing criminal inquiry.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Fed pivots to material risk – but what is it, exactly?
Top US bank regulator will prioritise risks that matter most, but they could prove hard to pinpoint
Hopes rise for EU re-entry to UK swaps market
EC says discussions on draft decision softening derivatives trading obligation are ‘advanced’
BoE’s Ramsden defends UK’s ring-fencing regime
Deputy governor also says regulatory reform is coming to the UK gilt repo market
Credit spread risk: the cryptic peril on bank balance sheets
Some bankers fear EU regulatory push on CSRBB has done little to improve risk management
Credit spread risk approach differs among EU banks, survey finds
KPMG survey of more than 90 banks reveals disagreement on how to treat liabilities and loans
Bowman’s Fed may limp on by after cuts
New vice-chair seeks efficiency, but staff clear-out could hamper functions, say former regulators
Review of 2025: It’s the end of the world, and it feels fine
Markets proved resilient as Trump redefined US policies – but questions are piling up about 2026 and beyond
Hong Kong derivatives regime could drive more offshore booking
Industry warns new capital requirements for securities firms are higher than other jurisdictions