No more investment banks, says SEC
The SEC has announced the failure of its investment banking supervision and an end to its consolidated supervised entities regime
WASHINGTON, DC – The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has announced the end of its consolidated supervised entities (CSE) programme of voluntary supervision – effectively spelling the end of investment banks on Wall Street.
In parallel press releases, the US regulator has accepted the failure of voluntary regulation of investment bank holding companies, concluding an investigation by its inspector-general in the wake of the Bear Stearns collapse in March 2008.
SEC chairman Christopher Cox says: “The past six months have made it abundantly clear that voluntary regulation does not work. When Congress passed the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, it created a significant regulatory gap by failing to give the SEC or any agency the authority to regulate large investment bank holding companies, like Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch, Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns.
“The inspector-general of the SEC today released a report on the CSE programme's supervision of Bear Stearns, and that report validates and echoes the concerns I have expressed to Congress. The report's major findings are ultimately derivative of the lack of specific legal authority for the SEC or any other agency to act as the regulator of these large investment bank holding companies.”
The SEC announcement represents something of a fait accompli. Bear Stearns, the first to fall of the ‘big five’ investment banks, was sold to JP Morgan Chase on March 16. Lehman Brothers filed for bankruptcy protection on September 15, the same day Merrill Lynch was sold to Bank of America. Both surviving dedicated investment banks – Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs –applied for status as ordinary (regulated) banks on September 21.
The statement by SEC chairman Cox can be downloaded from the following link.
http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2008/2008-230.htm
And the report into the demise of Bear Stearns can be downloaded from the link below.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Review of 2025: It’s the end of the world, and it feels fine
Markets proved resilient as Trump redefined US policies – but questions are piling up about 2026 and beyond
Hong Kong derivatives regime could drive more offshore booking
Industry warns new capital requirements for securities firms are higher than other jurisdictions
Will Iosco’s guidance solve pre-hedging puzzle?
Buy-siders doubt consent requirement will remove long-standing concerns
Responsible AI is about payoffs as much as principles
How one firm cut loan processing times and improved fraud detection without compromising on governance
Could one-off loan losses at US regional banks become systemic?
Investors bet Zions, Western Alliance are isolated problems, but credit risk managers are nervous
SEC poised to approve expansion of CME-FICC cross-margining
Agency’s new division heads moving swiftly on applications related to US Treasury clearing
ECB bank supervisors want top-down stress test that bites
Proposal would simplify capital structure with something similar to US stress capital buffer
Clearing houses warn Esma margin rules will stifle innovation
Changes in model confidence levels could still trip supervisory threshold even after relaxation in final RTS