Citigroup Clears The Decks With LSE
LONDON – Citigroup has tightened its internal processes, renegotiated its data licence with the London Stock Exchange, and paid the LSE £6.4 million for under-reporting its data usage, sources told sister publication Inside Market Data in early February.
The settlement, made late last year, covered the unauthorised usage of data from the LSE over a substantial period of time – possibly over the past decade, multiple sources say.
LSE officials decline to comment. "Citigroup highly values our relationship with the LSE and is committed to meeting our contractual obligations with them," says a bank spokesperson.
According to a source familiar with the situation, the LSE's auditing team went into the bank early last year and found "much broader usage than was being claimed and paid for".
No-one is suggesting that Citigroup intended to deliberately defraud the LSE. Instead, the error appears to be due to the growth of algorithmic trading and increased moves away from data terminal business models to open feeds. As a result, real-time data from the LSE and its index subsidiary FTSE was being used in algorithmic trading models, which were then proliferated throughout the organisation and re-used in other models. By all accounts, the bank did not realise that redistributing these models – which contained LSE data – to people not authorised to receive the data constituted a violation of its agreement.
"It just spreads internally like a virus, because no-one is monitoring that the licence is tied to a set number of users," the source says.
Following the discovery, Citigroup and the LSE entered into negotiations to resolve the issue to the satisfaction of both parties, and they finalised the settlement in the fourth quarter of last year, the source says. The bank has also agreed to tighten its controls, and has signed up to a new multi-year agreement with the exchange that includes a redistribution licence. It has also cut back on data usage beyond the number of users allowed by that agreement.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Lifeline keeps Europe’s hopes afloat for single-sided reporting
Despite Esma’s proposal for delegated reporting of trades, the industry may yet get its wish
EU’s plan to get competitive faces big legislative hurdles
Large and controversial legislative package may be too amorphous to deliver results quickly
FDIC relearns SVB lessons in resolution tinkering
Paring back requirements gets thumbs up from some, but concerns linger
Stablecoin consortia may be ‘interim’ step to solo bank issuance
Former Citi payments head and Ubyx founder says all G-Sibs will issue their own coins
Report once: will Esma’s €1bn reforms deliver the full picture?
Critics say plan to merge three reporting regimes will see scant returns, and won’t mesh with single-sided reporting
CFTC accused of ‘double standards’ on compute futures
Duffy questions ‘long review’ of CME’s contract when Kalshi already offers similar product
Europe’s banks can’t agree on how to fix the output floor
Some want market risk excluded, while others push for greater savings from credit modelling
SEC gunning to take over Cat in 2027
Regulator's bid for control of market surveillance apparatus splits industry participants