ETF Risk European Rankings 2015: Test of endurance

Holdings of ETFs have increased in past year but pace of growth has slowed


This year has broken records, yet again, for flows into European-listed exchange-traded funds (ETFs). But the latest iteration of our European ETF survey shows early signs of investors approaching saturation point, while issuers complain a fragmented market – and a lack of options for retail investors in particular – is making it harder than it should be to invest in these products.



"ETFs are taking an increasingly large share of fund flows and new money relative to some of the traditional fund wrappers," says Peter Thompson, president of Source ETF, a UK-based ETF provider. "They benefit from exchange trading, transparency, simplicity and an attractive cost structure compared with traditional mutual funds."

According to figures from London-based research and consultancy firm ETFGI, European-listed ETFs attracted $68.6 billion to the end of October, 11% higher than the $61.8 billion invested in new ETF issuances during the whole of 2014 – a year that itself saw roughly a doubling of flows compared with 2013.

However, among the asset managers, pension funds, insurance companies and private banks that responded to the survey, at least, appetite for increasing ETF holdings is lower than in 2014. This year, 37% said they planned to increase their holdings over the next 12 months (with more than three-quarters of those planning no more than a 25% increase in ETF assets). Last year, that figure was 52%. Most (58%) plan to keep their ETF holdings steady (compared with 47% in 2014), while almost one in 10 (9%) plan to sell down the product (1% in 2014).

This potential levelling off in demand comes after several years of double-digit growth in the European ETF market. Investors have been attracted to the low costs offered by these products, particularly in a market where higher-cost sources of alpha, such as hedge funds and actively managed mutual funds, have underperformed.

fuhr-deborah"Investors are rationalising where they can find consistent sources of alpha, and where they can't, they're embracing ETFs. As fees have come down, ETFs have become more efficient for investors to use than futures, if you're fully funded," says Deborah Fuhr (pictured), partner and co-founder of ETFGI.

Fuhr says that she sees no evidence of the growth in demand for ETFs moderating. But, she adds, access to the product could be better. "ETFs are often not included on the platforms that many financial advisers are using. Many online brokers don't include ETFs in the tracker or index fund category. There are a number of issues around ETFs not being dealt with in a level-playing-field fashion across Europe. Platforms claim there's not enough demand, but it's chicken and egg – if the platform only offers mutual funds, their customers are only going to buy mutual funds."

For investors selecting ETFs, liquidity remains the overriding concern, survey respondents say. Here, Europe is at a disadvantage to the US market, with no fewer than 26 exchanges listing ETFs. "Liquidity is definitely an issue," says Thompson at Source ETF. "In Europe, you have multiple exchanges and multiple listings - to some degree, that fragments liquidity."

Efforts are underway to reverse that fragmentation. For example, electronic platform Tradeweb, winner for the second year running of our Best ETF Trading Platform for Institutional Investors award, is aiming to aggregate liquidity through its ETF service. Meanwhile, in November, BlackRock, announced it is moving 20 iShares ETFs to a centralised settlement platform, to reduce the complexity of issuing and settling ETFs across a number of European jurisdictions.

A number of survey respondents repeated calls for a so-called ‘consolidated tape' for ETFs, a continuous electronic feed that would bring together ETF trading volumes and prices from European stock exchanges. "A consolidated tape would be part of the equation," says Philip Tychon, head of ETF capital markets at investment management giant Vanguard, noting that it would help to bring more visibility to the available liquidity, even if it did not concentrate it in one venue.

"Ideally, you'd have one market, but in Europe, that probably isn't realistic," he says. "As well as liquidity, exchange listings are also about distribution, and if you want to distribute an ETF into a specific market, a listing is important. Given some investors' ‘hold biases', if you want to serve them, you need to list on their local market."

A related issue is that a significant percentage of ETF trading in Europe – between 50% and 80% – takes place off-exchange, and may not be captured in trading volumes, reducing the perceived available liquidity.

As fees have come down, ETFs have become more efficient for investors to use than futures, if you're fully funded – Deborah Fuhr, ETFGI

"Turnover on stock exchanges is only part of the picture," says Source ETF's Thompson. "There is a case for OTC regulation. We would be supportive of changes requiring more trade reporting. More transparent sharing of volume figures would only benefit the market."

Tychon at Vanguard notes revisions to the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (Mifid II) will require OTC ETF trades to be reported. "The sooner ETFs become Mifid II-regulated instruments, the better for the product and the better for investors." However, in November, the European Parliament accepted that implementation should be delayed by a year, until January 2018.

Liquidity issues can cut both ways, says Hortense Bioy, the London-based director of passive fund research at investment research firm Morningstar. "ETFs can provide liquid access to illiquid asset classes, such as corporate bonds." While they offer continuous pricing and the perception of an easy exit when needed, there are concerns about that perception, she says. "Regulators and some investors are concerned about what would happen in a worst-case scenario: how easily would you be able to get out and, more importantly, at what price?" although she notes that this isn't an ETF-specific problem.

"The liquidity of an ETF largely depends on its underlying. This is something investors shouldn't forget," Bioy says. "During periods of market stress, if the underlying is illiquid, the ETF tracking it will reflect that illiquidity."

Easing counterparty concerns

Meanwhile, survey respondents are less concerned about counterparty risk than in previous years. Over the past 12 months, 80% of respondents have lowered their minimum counterparty rating as it relates to the swap counterparty or counterparties to securities lending transactions. Last year, 95% had either kept their minimum rating stable, or had raised it.

"A lot of work has been done in terms of investor protection and disclosure," says Bioy. "Issuers have improved risk-mitigating measures and are much more transparent, which has reassured investors." She adds that the trend from synthetic ETFs – where issuers entered into a swap to replicate the performance of the ETF's underlying – towards physical replication, where the issuer owns the underlying index constituents, has helped reduced counterparty risk concerns.

michael mohrThe survey findings show investors have a better understanding of how counterparty risk is managed in securities lending – with many issuers offering various layers of protection for investors, says Michael Mohr (pictured), head of exchange-traded product business development for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at Deutsche Asset & Wealth Management.

"The counterparty risk is collateralised, but the transactions can – depending on the issuer – also benefit from an indemnification. This means that if a counterparty were to default and the collateral amount was insufficient to recover the full amount of shares lent out, then Deutsche Bank would step in and cover that risk, guaranteeing the trade with its entire balance sheet," he says. "There has been a lot of misunderstanding of securities lending in the past."

Other issuers say their investors continue to favour a conservative approach to securities lending. Tychon says Vanguard pursues a "premium" approach to lending underlying stocks. "Some securities, such as the stocks in the S&P 500, are so readily available, it doesn't make sense to lend them out – the margins aren't there. By lending out securities that are harder to get in the market, you can get a premium for lending them out." This approach, he says, allows Vanguard to earn attractive returns from securities lending, without needing to lend out a high proportion of the underlying stocks.

This preference is reflected in the survey. Nearly half of respondents (45%) consider it inappropriate for an ETF issuer to lend more than 25% of the underlying securities.

In terms of ETF flows, smart beta indexes continue to attract assets, says Bioy at Morningstar. These seek to capture outperformance by identifying factors such as value, yield, and momentum that have generated premiums over traditional market cap benchmarks and, as such, sit somewhere between passive and active management. Index provider MSCI reports compound annual growth of 79% in assets benchmarked to its factor indexes over the three years to the end of June.

Meanwhile, the ETF wrapper continues to prove attractive to investors seeking new investment approaches. "Environmental, social and governance (ESG) indexes are getting a lot of traction," says Alain Dubois, head of new product development at index provider and research firm MSCI. Equity ETFs tracking MSCI ESG indexes grew 30% between the start of 2015 and the end of July, the company says, with 11 ESG ETFs being launched over the period. "They are not yet a major proportion of assets, but growth has been gigantic," he says.

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact or view our subscription options here:

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact to find out more.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here