Ferc unable to regulate OTC derivatives, admits own official
Charles Whitmore, special assistant in the office of market oversight at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Ferc), told an EPRM enterprise-wide risk management conference in Houston, Texas, yesterday, that he did not think the Ferc was capable of regulating energy derivatives – nor was the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), he added.
He added: “Expecting the Ferc to oversee regulating [OTC] derivatives trading is just crazy. And I’m sad to say that, because in the long term it is going to be the industry’s biggest issue, and the Ferc should be involved.”
The source added that the Ferc was fundamentally a paper factory, which goes against its real job of monitoring markets. “It’s about knowing the neighborhood. The Ferc is a police unit that’s supposed to police a Hispanic neighborhood – without a single Hispanic cop on the force.”
Energy derivatives have been exempt from regulation since Congress passed the Commodity Futures Modernization Act in 2000. But democratic senator Dianne Feinstein is trying to push a bill through Congress that would put energy derivatives firmly in the Ferc and the CFTC’s control.
Feinstein’s bill would make over-the-counter energy derivatives trades comply with reporting, record keeping, registration and capital reserve requirements similar to those that apply to regulated exchanges. The bill was defeated in February this year, but as new details of Enron’s behaviour and market abuse are released, the bill has found a second wind.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
From Pillar to Pillar… to post: where now for op risk in Europe?
Experts think enhanced Pillar 2 charge informed by Dora would be more useful than a blunt Pillar 1
PRA struggles to follow Fed’s FRTB modelling moves
Market risk experts say minor differences in US rules add up to more incentives for IMA adoption
Lifeline keeps Europe’s hopes afloat for single-sided reporting
Despite Esma’s proposal for delegated reporting of trades, the industry may yet get its wish
EU’s plan to get competitive faces big legislative hurdles
Large and controversial legislative package may be too amorphous to deliver results quickly
FDIC relearns SVB lessons in resolution tinkering
Paring back requirements gets thumbs up from some, but concerns linger
Stablecoin consortia may be ‘interim’ step to solo bank issuance
Former Citi payments head and Ubyx founder says all G-Sibs will issue their own coins
Report once: will Esma’s €1bn reforms deliver the full picture?
Critics say plan to merge three reporting regimes will see scant returns, and won’t mesh with single-sided reporting
CFTC accused of ‘double standards’ on compute futures
Duffy questions ‘long review’ of CME’s contract when Kalshi already offers similar product