Ferc unable to regulate OTC derivatives, admits own official
Charles Whitmore, special assistant in the office of market oversight at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Ferc), told an EPRM enterprise-wide risk management conference in Houston, Texas, yesterday, that he did not think the Ferc was capable of regulating energy derivatives – nor was the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), he added.
He added: “Expecting the Ferc to oversee regulating [OTC] derivatives trading is just crazy. And I’m sad to say that, because in the long term it is going to be the industry’s biggest issue, and the Ferc should be involved.”
The source added that the Ferc was fundamentally a paper factory, which goes against its real job of monitoring markets. “It’s about knowing the neighborhood. The Ferc is a police unit that’s supposed to police a Hispanic neighborhood – without a single Hispanic cop on the force.”
Energy derivatives have been exempt from regulation since Congress passed the Commodity Futures Modernization Act in 2000. But democratic senator Dianne Feinstein is trying to push a bill through Congress that would put energy derivatives firmly in the Ferc and the CFTC’s control.
Feinstein’s bill would make over-the-counter energy derivatives trades comply with reporting, record keeping, registration and capital reserve requirements similar to those that apply to regulated exchanges. The bill was defeated in February this year, but as new details of Enron’s behaviour and market abuse are released, the bill has found a second wind.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EU states take the slow road to new cross-border services ban
Late national transposition hampers foreign banks’ decisions on location of affected activities
Don’t mention the rules: the fight against prediction market abuse
For the CFTC to regulate new venues effectively, it must first redefine insider trading
Can the US FRTB revamp make the IMA great again?
Banks are finally presented with a viable internal models framework under Basel III’s market risk rules
UK rethinking tougher capital rules for US bank subsidiaries
US endgame draft would trigger UK Basel III trap floor for foreign banks, but PRA is reviewing
EBA proposes drastic overhaul to supervisory data reporting
Revamp will cut back the number of datapoints and integrate overlapping reports
CFTC wants to regulate prediction markets. Is it up to the task?
Former officials echo state gambling authorities’ concerns over agency’s ability to police betting risks
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say