Hong Kong SFC suspends Credit Suisse prop trader
A convertible bond proprietary trader at Credit Suisse has left the bank after being suspended by Hong Kong’s Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) for alleged insider trading.
The statement also said that the practice of disclosing terms, known as sounding out, means underwriters disclose non-public information such as transaction terms before it is publicly announced, to assess interest from prospective buyers. However, anyone who trades upon that information is likely in breach of insider trading provisions, if the shares are listed in Hong Kong.
Hug eventually sold 204,000 SLM shares valued at approximately $230,000 on December 2, 2003. The SFC statement said Hug had prior information that the convertible bonds would be announced after the market closed on the same day, and that the issue price would be fixed on December 3, 2003.
In response to questions from Risk News about whether Hug was dismissed, a Credit Suisse spokesman said only that he will “cease to be employed”. This followed an investigation that led the bank to suspend him for one month without pay, fine him and deny him $400,000 worth of discretionary bonus. The regulator suspended Hug from trading for four months from 13 December 2006 to 12 April 2007.
The irregularity was first raised by the Japanese Securities and Exchange Surveillance Commission in 2004, said the Credit Suisse spokesman. The bank conducted an internal investigation and voluntarily turned over its findings to the SFC, he added.
Although Hug did not contravene Hong Kong’s securities law because trading happened on the Tokyo Stock Exchange, the SFC found him in breach of its code of conduct, which “requires licensed persons in Hong Kong to act with due skill, care and diligence in the best interests of clients and market integrity, a breach of which raises issues of fitness and properness”.
This is the first time the SFC has taken disciplinary action against misconduct related to sounding out. Mark Steward, SFC’s executive director of enforcement, said in a statement: “This case is a warning to all firms to review internal practices and guidelines on handling confidential information to ensure the obvious risks of sounding out – including insider dealing and prejudicial conflicts of interest – are adequately addressed. Regulated persons, both firms and individuals, who fail to heed this warning will face serious consequences.”
Credit Suisse donated $7,200, the profit from the transaction, to charity.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Double, but no trouble? CVA capital hit may lack clout
Industry opinion mixed around Basel III endgame derivatives charge
Amid debanking drama, banks try to say ‘no’, safely
A basic risk management tool – the ability to turn a customer away – has become a political football
Erba myth: will US banks choose new capital measure?
B3E gives US banks a dilemma – adopt expanded risk-based approach, or a new standardised alternative
Illiquid assets pricing still needs expert judgement, say banks
EU regulators want more transparency in valuations, but some asset prices remain elusive
Fed to move tailored-capital goalposts soon, says Bowman
Banks hope agencies will index triggers for harsher capital rules to economic growth
Will SEC reporting proposal supercharge alt data providers?
Move that would allow companies to opt out of quarterly reporting disclosures welcomed
EU lawmaker calls for review of Luxembourg’s cross-border rules
Grand Duchy accused of side-stepping rules aimed at prising away banking business from London
Un-American or un-JPM? Surcharge rethink divides G-Sibs
Some see sense in rethink to funding indicator, others call for a backtrack