New lobby group to defend securitisation markets
As pressure for reform in the securitisation market grows, three regional industry lobbying groups - the American Securitisation Forum (ASF), the European Securitisation Forum (ESF) and the Securities Industry and Futures Markets Association (Sifma) - have banded together to protect the market against regulatory pressure.
The new group, the Joint Securitisation Markets Working Group, will be led by TIAA-CREF's head of global public markets, Sanjeev Handa, and Citi's co-head of global securitised markets, Jeffrey Perlowitz.
The group is surveying Sifma, ESF and Australian Securitisation Forum members, as well as some non-member banks, and plans to produce a white paper in August or September this year listing their concerns. The aim is to meet regulatory concerns about the lack of market discipline and transparency in the securitisation market, while still ensuring the market can flourish.
Regulatory attention has focused on the securitisation market in the wake of the credit crisis, with groups such as the International Organisation of Securities Commissions calling for better understanding of the risks involved and more conservative treatment by rating agencies. This week's announcement is a response to a call from the US President's Working Group on Financial Markets for a private-sector group to spread best practice on transparency in securitisation, the group said.
See also: Basel committee outlines reforms for rating agencies
Ratings, regulation and risk
Restoring ratings
Vision on
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos