Former JP Morgan Chase fund trio make £55m
Three foreign exchange and fixed-income specialists who left JP Morgan Chase to set up a hedge fund have made profits of more than £55 million ($100 million) in their first year, according to RiskNews ' sister publication, FX Week .
They are the most profitable example of a common trend of the past two years: traders leaving banking jobs to set up currency and fixed-income hedge funds.
Reports of such stellar returns make it harder for banks to keep hold of their proprietary traders, who are increasingly leaving banks’ trading desks for the lucrative world of hedge fund management.
LDFM started with $1 billion under management, much of which came from JP Morgan Chase, where the directors managed the fund in-house before it was spun-off in 2002.
About 85% of hedge funds start out in this manner, estimated one trading manager at a bank in London. But the growing popularity of currency hedge funds means it is becoming more of a problem for banks’ prop foreign exchange desks.
Putting capital into a hedge fund set up by departing staff is one way that banks are dealing with this problem: by doing so, they are effectively outsourcing their prop desk -- and risk - to an external group. But banks may also have to start considering a return to the traditional pay structure for prop traders - a 10% share of their takings - rather than paying guaranteed bonuses to combat the lure of the buy side, said one ex-trader in London.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos
Long way round: EU banks lament credit spread saga
EBA ditches some of banks’ preferred qualitative reasonings – and shortcuts – for CSRBB exclusion