FSA proposes new capital adequacy framework
Britain’s principal business regulator, the Financial Services Authority (FSA), is seeking comments on its proposed capital adequacy framework, which is designed to more closely align the amount of capital a company holds with the risks it takes.
The supervisory body said the proposed framework reflects a new risk-based approach to regulation, adding that it builds on existing requirements that currently do not capture “all the risks facing all firms”.
Clive Briault, director of prudential standards at the FSA, said: “This proposed framework... meets our overall aim of reducing the probability of prudential failure... while at the same time promoting a strong culture of risk management.”
The FSA proposes implementing the new requirements in 2004 for insurance firms. It plans to implement them for other firms at a later date, depending on progress made with the revised Basel capital Accord and European Union capital adequacy legislation.
The FSA is seeking comments by August 2002. Responses can be made online at the FSA’s website (www.fsa.gov.uk).
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Risk, portfolio margin, regulation: regtech to the rescue
A white paper outlining the complexity of setting the course for risk, margin and regulation
Prop shops recoil from EU’s ‘ill-fitting’ capital regime
Large proprietary trading firms complain they are subject to hand-me-down rules originally designed for banks
Revealed: the three EU banks applying for IMA approval
BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank and Intesa Sanpaolo ask ECB to use internal models for FRTB
FCA presses UK non-banks to put their affairs in order
Greater scrutiny of wind-down plans by regulator could alter capital and liquidity requirements
Industry calls for major rethink of Basel III rules
Isda AGM: Divergence on implementation suggests rules could be flawed, bankers say
Saudi Arabia poised to become clean netting jurisdiction
Isda AGM: Netting regulation awaiting final approvals from regulators
Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
Isda AGM: All in-scope banks opt for standardised approach to market risk; Nomura eyes IMA in 2025
CFTC chair backs easing of G-Sib surcharge in Basel endgame
Isda AGM: Fed’s proposed surcharge changes could hike client clearing cost by 80%
Most read
- Revealed: the three EU banks applying for IMA approval
- Industry urges focus on initial margin instead of intraday VM
- Top 10 operational risks for 2024