Online banking attacks rise
The FDIC reports an increase in online banking attacks but industry experts say the medium is still safe to use
WASHINGTON – An internal Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) report from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, leaked to The Washington Post, shows that US financial institutions reported a notable increase in online bank account fraud in 2007.
Quarterly SARs for second-quarter 2007 show that the average loss from computer intrusion-related SARs was around $30,000, up from $10,000 a year ago. Although the number of online fraud-related SARs was low at 536 when compared with the 17, 558 notices of cheque fraud, the double-digit rise suggests online criminals are employing more sophisticated technology to tap into online bank accounts.
The report indicates that in most cases, banks are at a loss to say exactly how cyber crooks are stealing the funds. The report indicates that the 80% of the computer intrusions were classified as "unknown unauthorized access – online banking," and that "unknown unauthorised access to online banking has risen from 10% to 63% in the past year." The report indicates that a large share of the unknown losses were probably the result of data-stealing programs, such as Trojan horses and key-logging software, installed surreptitiously on customer PCs.
Many of the SARs showed that criminals targeted online bill payment applications but the most significant losses came from unauthorised access to wire transfers and automated clearing house payments, which gave the banks less time to detect and recover the funds.
Despite these results, Fortify Software, the application vulnerability specialist, says e-banking services are still safe.
"Banking online is still safe for most users, provided they keep their IT security software bang up-to-date and, ideally, have multiple security applications loaded at all times. It's just that identify theft techniques have improved a lot recently," said Rob Rachwald, Fortify Software's director of product marketing.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Will Iosco’s guidance solve pre-hedging puzzle?
Buy-siders doubt consent requirement will remove long-standing concerns
Responsible AI is about payoffs as much as principles
How one firm cut loan processing times and improved fraud detection without compromising on governance
Could one-off loan losses at US regional banks become systemic?
Investors bet Zions, Western Alliance are isolated problems, but credit risk managers are nervous
SEC poised to approve expansion of CME-FICC cross-margining
Agency’s new division heads moving swiftly on applications related to US Treasury clearing
ECB bank supervisors want top-down stress test that bites
Proposal would simplify capital structure with something similar to US stress capital buffer
Clearing houses warn Esma margin rules will stifle innovation
Changes in model confidence levels could still trip supervisory threshold even after relaxation in final RTS
BlackRock, Citadel Securities, Nasdaq mull tokenised equities’ impact on regulations
An SEC panel recently debated the ramifications of a future with tokenised equities
CCPs trade blows over EU’s new open access push
Cboe Clear wants more interoperability; Euronext says ‘not with us’