CEBS offers technical advice on CAD
New consultation paper published on proposals on options and national discretions in the Capital Requirements Directive
BRUSSELS – The Committee of European Banking Supervisors (CEBS) has begun a public consultation on its proposals on options and national discretions in the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD), as part of developing its response to the European Commission's Call for Technical Advice. The consultation is open to all interested parties, including supervised institutions and other market participants.
The paper sets out CEBS’s preliminary proposals on the future treatment of options and national discretions identified in its supervisory disclosure framework, and some additional provisions that could potentially be construed as national discretions identified by market participants in their responses to CEBS’s public questionnaire. CEBS has already received input on this issue in response to a public questionnaire published on its website and in meetings with market participants. In keeping with the European Commission's better regulation agenda, the preliminary proposals are supported by a high-level impact assessment/cost-benefit analysis.
CEBS is proposing to keep about one-fifth of the 152 provisions covered in its analysis open to national discretion, but also suggests accompanying proposals, where possible, to alleviate any negative side-effects of these national discretions. CEBS notes that more than one-third of these national discretions will expire within a short time. For the other discretions, CEBS is proposing solutions that it believes can bring about further harmonisation of supervisory practices and level the playing field among institutions. Within this group, CEBS is proposing in roughly a quarter of the cases either to keep them or to transform them into supervisory decisions to be implemented and applied case by case. CEBS believes its proposals strike the right balance between the prudential concerns of its members, the flexibility supervisors need to perform their duties, and the interests of domestic and cross-border institutions.
The consultation period is now open and runs until August 15, 2008. Comments should be sent to: cp18@c-ebs.org.
A public hearing will take place on June 17, 2008.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Will Iosco’s guidance solve pre-hedging puzzle?
Buy-siders doubt consent requirement will remove long-standing concerns
Responsible AI is about payoffs as much as principles
How one firm cut loan processing times and improved fraud detection without compromising on governance
Could one-off loan losses at US regional banks become systemic?
Investors bet Zions, Western Alliance are isolated problems, but credit risk managers are nervous
SEC poised to approve expansion of CME-FICC cross-margining
Agency’s new division heads moving swiftly on applications related to US Treasury clearing
ECB bank supervisors want top-down stress test that bites
Proposal would simplify capital structure with something similar to US stress capital buffer
Clearing houses warn Esma margin rules will stifle innovation
Changes in model confidence levels could still trip supervisory threshold even after relaxation in final RTS
BlackRock, Citadel Securities, Nasdaq mull tokenised equities’ impact on regulations
An SEC panel recently debated the ramifications of a future with tokenised equities
CCPs trade blows over EU’s new open access push
Cboe Clear wants more interoperability; Euronext says ‘not with us’