Journal of Risk

Risk.net

The importance of attributing active risk to benchmark-relative sources

Ben Davis and Jose Menchero

ABSTRACT

We demonstrate the importance of attributing active risk and return to the same underlying sources. We define and compare absolute and relative sources for securities, sectors and factors. We provide detailed examples and argue that benchmark-relative return sources are more appropriate for analyzing active portfolios. Usage of absolute return sources instead of relative return sources may lead to a number of problems, including a mismatch between risk and return sources, nonintuitive marginal contributions to risk, and flagging aggressive positions as risk reducing. These drawbacks are remedied by the use of benchmark-relative sources, which results in a set of consistent and intuitive effects.

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here