Journal of Risk Model Validation

Risk.net

Can we take the “stress” out of stress testing? Applications of generalized structural equation modeling to consumer finance

José Canals-Cerdá

  • Financial models are often developed in separate components and validated separately.
  • The empirical framework endorses a modular and holistic approach to model building that enhances the overall model development process and simplifies model validation, production and redevelopment.
  • We apply this framework to the problem of integrating stress test and Current Expected Credit Loss (CECL) model infrastructures. This illustrative exercise is interesting and informative in its own right.

Statistical model infrastructures at financial institutions are often developed using a piecemeal approach to model building, in which different components of complex interrelated statistical models are developed and validated separately. We propose an empirical framework, spurred by recent developments in the implementation of generalized structural equation modeling (GSEM), which brings to bear a modular and all-inclusive approach to statistical model building. We illustrate the “game changing” potential of this framework with an application to the stress testing of credit risk for a representative portfolio of mortgages; we also extend it to the analysis of the allowance for credit loss under the novel Current Expected Credit Losses (CECL) accounting regulation. We illustrate how GSEM techniques can significantly enhance every step of the modeling management life cycle, from development and documentation to validation, production and redevelopment. We also illustrate how GSEM can be used to combine various risk management projects and tasks into a single framework; we specifically illustrate how to seamlessly integrate stress testing and CECL (or International Financial Reporting Standard 9) frameworks and champion, and challenger, modeling frameworks. Finally, we identify other areas of model risk management that can benefit from the GSEM framework and highlight other potentially fruitful applications of the methodology.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

If you already have an account, please sign in here.

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: