Journal of Investment Strategies

Risk.net

An uncertainty quantification framework for the achievability of backtesting results of trading strategies

Raymond Hon-Fu Chan, Alfred Ka-Chun Ma and Lanston Lane-Chun Yeung

  • Proposes a framework for implementing and backtesting trading strategies.
  • Introduces the return at risk to quantify the achievability of trading strategies.
  • A significant number of trading strategies with positive returns are found to be not achievable.

Backtesting has always been indispensable in analyzing the profitability of trading strategies in the empirical finance literature. When measuring return, while most of the literature implicitly assumes that a trade can be implemented at the same closing price as the one generating the trading signal, some empirical evidence has been found suggesting that this assumption presents a significant challenge to the robustness of their results. Hence, several alternative return measurements have been proposed, including the incorporation of a one-day delay to mitigate this execution latency. The mix of opinions on this issue prompted us to quantify whether backtesting results could be achieved with such implementation uncertainty. In particular, we propose a framework for implementing and backtesting trading strategies. A new concept called return-at-risk is introduced to quantify such an ability, and we illustrate our proposed framework using a representative class of trading strategies. Our results show that a significant number of technical trading strategies with positive returns are found to be unviable in the presence of implementation uncertainty.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an indvidual account here: