Journal of Financial Market Infrastructures

Risk.net

Nonmonotonic trade-offs of tiering in a large-value payment system

Carlos A. Arango-Arango and Freddy Cepeda

  • Liquidity savings not always increase with tiering in RTGS systems.
  • High levels of tiering have low effects on concentration and counterparty risks.
  • Tiering could bring high risks for some correspondent banks in terms of solvency.
  • The network becomes less connected and TBTF-TCTF participants emerge with tiering.

Even though international authorities encourage open and wide access to large-value payment systems, the optimal level of access, or tiering, is still an open problem. For real-time gross settlement systems, it may be limited by the trade-off between the potentially higher liquidity needs of a larger pool of direct participants settling in real time and the lower counterparty credit risks resulting from a smaller number of second-tier participants entering uncovered bilateral credit positions with correspondent banks. The literature has evaluated this trade-off through simulations, finding monotonically increasing liquidity savings and increasing credit risk exposures as the level of tiering in the system rises. In contrast, we find that, in the Colombian real-time gross settlement systems, liquidity savings increase but then decrease with higher tiering, showing a humped shape. Our results provide insights into the effects of tiering when participants are too big or too connected to tier.
 

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an indvidual account here: