メインコンテンツに移動
Risk Quantum Banks

Fed methodology adds as much as 2% to US G-Sib surcharges

Morgan Stanley’s binding add-on is three times as high as under Basel framework

The US Federal Reserve’s parallel methodology for scoring global systemically important banks continues to generate higher capital surcharges for top US banks than under Basel rules, Risk Quantum analysis shows, as hopes fade that formulas will be revised to level the field with overseas peers anytime soon.

Once designated as G-Sibs by the Financial Stability Board under the Basel Committee on

コンテンツを印刷またはコピーできるのは、有料の購読契約を結んでいるユーザー、または法人購読契約の一員であるユーザーのみです。

これらのオプションやその他の購読特典を利用するには、info@risk.net にお問い合わせいただくか、こちらの購読オプションをご覧ください: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

現在、このコンテンツをコピーすることはできません。詳しくはinfo@risk.netまでお問い合わせください。

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

ログイン
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here