メインコンテンツに移動

FSB debates how to fit climate risk into capital rules

Regulators ponder whether climate risk needs new RWAs or recalibration of existing ones

climate_Getty

Regulators are still undecided on whether the risks associated with climate change can be handled within the existing bank prudential framework, or will need separate risk weights and capital add-ons, an official at the Financial Stability Board has said.

Joseph Noss, head of vulnerabilities assessment at the FSB, told an event organised by the Institute for International Finance (IIF) on

コンテンツを印刷またはコピーできるのは、有料の購読契約を結んでいるユーザー、または法人購読契約の一員であるユーザーのみです。

これらのオプションやその他の購読特典を利用するには、info@risk.net にお問い合わせいただくか、こちらの購読オプションをご覧ください: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

現在、このコンテンツをコピーすることはできません。詳しくはinfo@risk.netまでお問い合わせください。

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

ログイン
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here