メインコンテンツに移動

Intesa Sanpaolo takes $235 million hit for AML failures

Megan van Ooyen from SAS rounds up the top five operational risk losses for December 2016

intesa-sanpaolo
Intesa Sanpaolo officers manually bypassed automated controls, resulting in sanctions breaches

Efforts to combat money laundering and prevent transactions with internationally sanctioned entities have been a priority of financial regulators around the globe in recent times – nowhere more so than in the US. Take, for example, the New York Department of Financial Services (DFS), which has significantly ramped up its Bank Secrecy Act and anti-money laundering enforcement actions in the past

コンテンツを印刷またはコピーできるのは、有料の購読契約を結んでいるユーザー、または法人購読契約の一員であるユーザーのみです。

これらのオプションやその他の購読特典を利用するには、info@risk.net にお問い合わせいただくか、こちらの購読オプションをご覧ください: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

現在、このコンテンツをコピーすることはできません。詳しくはinfo@risk.netまでお問い合わせください。

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

無料メンバーシップの内容をお知りになりたいですか?ここをクリック

パスワードを表示
パスワードを非表示にする

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

ログイン
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here