メインコンテンツに移動

US industry split on captives fix

US regulators are trying to patch up rules on captive insurers while they await a more thorough overhaul of reserving. Proposals put forward in June, however, leave the industry little closer to a consensus. The differences that are emerging could jeopardise longer term plans, reports Louie Woodall

cracked-us-flag

The year 2013 marked the 10-year anniversary of the first Regulation XXX excess reserve funding transaction. During the early 2000s, the use of securitisations and captive insurers to offload the punitive statutory requirements associated with level premium term insurance (XXX reserves) and universal life with secondary guarantees (ULSG) products (AXXX reserves) became a popular feature of the US

コンテンツを印刷またはコピーできるのは、有料の購読契約を結んでいるユーザー、または法人購読契約の一員であるユーザーのみです。

これらのオプションやその他の購読特典を利用するには、info@risk.net にお問い合わせいただくか、こちらの購読オプションをご覧ください: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

現在、このコンテンツをコピーすることはできません。詳しくはinfo@risk.netまでお問い合わせください。

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

無料メンバーシップの内容をお知りになりたいですか?ここをクリック

パスワードを表示
パスワードを非表示にする

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

ログイン
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here