メインコンテンツに移動

Risk USA: debate continues over defining reputational risk

Negative events may not damage financial institutions' reputations, conference hears

businesswhisper

Reputational risk should be seen as an impact and not a risk, delegates at Risk USA were told this week. Panellists argued that measuring the impact of reputational risk is difficult – often because the link between a negative event and reputational damage is uncertain.

"I don't believe it's a risk and we struggle with this topic because we have to ask, is it a risk?" Craig Spielmann, global head

コンテンツを印刷またはコピーできるのは、有料の購読契約を結んでいるユーザー、または法人購読契約の一員であるユーザーのみです。

これらのオプションやその他の購読特典を利用するには、info@risk.net にお問い合わせいただくか、こちらの購読オプションをご覧ください: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

現在、このコンテンツをコピーすることはできません。詳しくはinfo@risk.netまでお問い合わせください。

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

ログイン
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here