メインコンテンツに移動

Global insurer systemic risk proposals stoke controversy

With the inaugural list of global systemically important insurers published, the insurance industry is troubled by the opaque decision-making process and a lack of guidance on how other firms can avoid being branded the same. Meanwhile, quickly evolving plans to develop a global capital backstop for insurers are also worrying some. Louie Woodall reports

Shouting man

Whether insurers pose a systemic risk to the financial sector and, if so, how this risk should be managed has been troubling politicians, policy-makers and regulators since the financial crisis.

At the end of July, the International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS) and the Financial Stability Board (FSB) offered some answers to these questions, publishing a list of those insurance

コンテンツを印刷またはコピーできるのは、有料の購読契約を結んでいるユーザー、または法人購読契約の一員であるユーザーのみです。

これらのオプションやその他の購読特典を利用するには、info@risk.net にお問い合わせいただくか、こちらの購読オプションをご覧ください: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

現在、このコンテンツをコピーすることはできません。詳しくはinfo@risk.netまでお問い合わせください。

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

ログイン
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here