Op risk rules inadequate, says Isma professor

Basel II, which all internationally active banks should adopt by 2007, currently has three stages for operational risk capital charges: a basic indicator approach, a standardised approach and an advanced measurements approach. But all three approaches fail to encourage tighter risk manangement, Pézier claimed.

Specifically, under the standard approach, the linear model fails to provide incentives for better risk management, Pézier claimed. Under this approach, capital charges are 12% if the financial entity is operating as a retail bank, asset manager or retail brokerage; 15% if it is a commercial bank; and 18% if the bank is offering corporate finance, trading and sales or payment and settlement functions. But the approach ignores diversification, Pézier added, leading to “falsely safe” models and assumptions.

Also, since the exposure of financial industries to operational risks may be on the increase, operational risks need to be assessed and alternative strategies examined, Pézier added. “But risk management is an integral part of good management, and too narrow a focus, based on Basel II rules, could lead to sub-optimal decisions.”

When asked whether the Basel II operational risk rules were realistic, 56% of the delegates at the conference, hosted by software company SAS, said they were unhappy with the rules. A total of 62% said they were concerned about inadequate data for calculating capital charges across operational, credit and market risk.

Paul Lyon

For similar articles please visit www.BaselAlert.com - an indispensable source of news, comment and analysis on the development of the Basel II accord and banking supervision. The site contains a searchable archive of news, articles and technical papers, and a free monthly e-mail summary. Click here for a free trial.