メインコンテンツに移動

The name game

The UK market has been beset by debate over whether the counterparty to a product should be named in the marketing material. Usually, only a minimum rating is revealed, but this practice has been criticised since Lehman Brothers went bankrupt. As we await an adjudication from the UK Financial Services Authority, Richard Jory asks: 'Does the counterparty need to be named in the third party offering material of UK retail structured products?'

sp-apr09-09-gif

Colin Jackson - Director, Baronworth Investment Services, Essex

In the uncertain economic climate, naming the counterparty in the marketing literature would be of enormous benefit to both the adviser and the investing client but it seems as though sometimes this is just not possible. For example, the provider may not select the counterparty until after the literature has been produced.

In this event

コンテンツを印刷またはコピーできるのは、有料の購読契約を結んでいるユーザー、または法人購読契約の一員であるユーザーのみです。

これらのオプションやその他の購読特典を利用するには、info@risk.net にお問い合わせいただくか、こちらの購読オプションをご覧ください: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

現在、このコンテンツをコピーすることはできません。詳しくはinfo@risk.netまでお問い合わせください。

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

無料メンバーシップの内容をお知りになりたいですか?ここをクリック

パスワードを表示
パスワードを非表示にする

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

ログイン
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here