
Confirmation keeps OTC trading costs high, survey finds
Z/Yen's director of financial services, Jeremy Smith, said that the increases were the result of the growing popularity of exotic derivatives.
"Exotics tend to be two or three times as manually intensive as vanilla products," he said. "For an exotic interest rate derivative, 36% of the cost of the trade is the cost of confirmation; for a vanilla product it is 22% and for a forward rate agreement, 15%."
Increasing automation has brought down the cost of processing more standard products, but exotics still require manpower, he added. "For a vanilla product, you can match it by going through something like Swapswire. For an exotic, you have to match it yourself on a pen and paper basis... it costs so much because as a result you have a constant backlog and hordes of clerks trying to deal with it."
Staffing costs are likely to remain high: "Not many banks have moved processing outside London for derivatives, because it requires a degree of product knowledge. Eventually, standardisation and automation and the growth of utilities will cut costs – as will better netting."
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Infrastructure
Revealed: where banks are (literally) warehousing their swaps
As derivatives notional grows, dealers experiment with novel storage solutions
E-trading takes hold for FX swaps – sort of
Bulk of trades are being executed over screen, but bolder changes have stalled
From DNA to DHA – Preparing for a new era of digital human augmentation
As technology increasingly permeates societies, cultures and everyday activities, its integration into people’s lives is having a profound impact on what is expected of people in the workplace. Deloitte examines this evolution of today’s workforce, the…
Risk and finance: Working more closely together
Video interview: Thomas Kimner, SAS
Video interview: Fabio Merlino, Intesa Sanpaolo
Fabio Merlino, head of retail and insurance risk discusses how the wealth management division of Intesa Sanpaolo upgraded its risk analytics capabilities with the algo system used by its proprietary traders
The changing face of Risk.net and our magazines
Extensive reader consultation has helped us reshape editorial teams and our site
Fed discount window could resolve CCP collateral liquidity concerns, say clearers
US regulatory concerns about liquidity of government securities collateral could be resolved by access to the Fed’s discount window, CCP officials say
Exchange order types prompt fears of HFT conspiracy
High-frequency traders have been viewed with suspicion for some time. Now critics claim exchanges are conspiring with the traders to develop tools that benefit them and disadvantage ordinary investors. Is the threat real? Laurie Carver reports