Editor's letter


Multi-billion dollar corporations with massive global influence rarely admit they are wrong. So you know a company has made a world-class blunder when its chief executive issues a mea culpa via the pages of a financial magazine.

So it was this month, as Moody's chairman and chief executive Ray McDaniel and his right-hand man Brian Clarkson spoke to us to explain what went wrong with JDA, the agency's much-criticised new rating methodology for global banks. The attempt to give more weight to assumptions of greater external support for banks than corporates went down like a lead balloon.

Reading their comments it becomes clearer how the agency managed to misjudge the market's likely reaction so acutely.

The range of pressures on rating agencies is immense: if their ratings don't accurately predict default, legislators hold enquiries. If they are volatile, reflecting real-time changes in the issuer's default probability, investors aren't happy. On top of that, different investors use ratings for different reasons: those that are marking positions to market are more interested in real-time assessment of creditworthiness than ultimate default probability like buy-and-hold investors. The bottom line is that a credit rating is a continual trade-off between accuracy, stability and usefulness as defined by a range of competing market uses.

Speaking out against accusations that JDA was devised for commercial imperatives - that argument resting on the observation that the beneficiaries of the new methodology were Moody's clients winning sudden and unexpected upgrades - the agency's top brass deliver a frank explanation of how competing priorities are balanced to assess credit ratings. They also display refreshing honesty in recognising a mistake and putting it right. As Ray McDaniel says: "We have nothing to gain by annoying everybody."

Nikki Marmery, Editor.

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Stemming the tide of rising FX settlement risk

As the trading of emerging markets currencies gathers pace and broader uncertainty sweeps across financial markets, CLS is exploring alternative services designed to mitigate settlement risk for the FX market

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here