
UBS continues losing streak into Q1
Grübel said the result was due to losses on illiquid risk positions, credit loss expenses and writedowns on the assets transferred to the Swiss National Bank's Stabfund - a special-purpose vehicle created last October to absorb up to $39.1 billion of the firm's toxic US and European residential and commercial-backed securities, as well as other asset-backed securities on its balance sheet.
The bank's poor results for the first quarter follow a Sfr8.1 billion loss incurred in the final quarter of 2008, and a net loss of SFr20.9 billion for the full year.
UBS plans to save up to Sfr4 billion by the end of 2010 by reducing costs, most of which will come from cutting 8,300 of its 76,200 employees by the end of 2010.
On April 13, in contrast to the Swiss firm's disappointing start to 2009, US bank Goldman Sachs reported a first-quarter net profit of $1.81 billion, while on April 9 Wells Fargo announced an expected Q1 gain of approximately $3 billion. In addition, Bank of America, Citi, Credit Suisse, JP Morgan and Deutsche Bank have all predicted profits for Q1, while analysts expect Barclays, BNP Paribas, HSBC and Morgan Stanley could also finish March in the black.
See also: Q4 loss of Sfr8.1 billion for UBS
UBS admits Sfr20.9 billion loss for 2008
SNB issues US dollar debt to fund UBS's bad bank
'Technical' factors drive banks back to profit
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Foreign exchange
Power-reverse to the future: falling yen revs up PRDCs again
Pressure on Japanese unit sparks revival in power-reverse dual currency notes
Credit Suisse and Commerz latest banks to ditch hold times
Mizuho also confirms zero last look add-on but MUFG’s policy unclear on the controversial FX practice
Has Covid stopped the clocks on FX timestamp efforts?
Budget reallocation may not be the only factor stalling standardisation progress, say participants
EU benchmark drama set for cliffhanger end
Access to key FX rates due to be decided six months before potential cut-off
Banks rent ready-made algos for FX trading
NatWest, XTX Markets and others develop new outsourcing model for tech
Who killed FX volatility?
Beyond central bank policy, traders see a range of hidden structural factors at work
Harnessing the benefits of more automated fx trade lifecycle operations
FX markets are unique not only in their scale but also in their complexity. There are multiple trading paradigms, and also multiple venues where trades may be executed. The FX ecosystem is highly fragmented and the case for more automation – more…
Smarter trading in a fragmented world
FX Week recently hosted a webinar in partnership with Refinitiv to ask foreign exchange industry leaders to discuss geopolitical challenges, market changes and developments, and evolving technologies, and how they have shaped forex markets in Asia