Guilty or not?

Rating agencies have been widely criticised for assigning AAA ratings to securitisations backed by subprime mortgages. Ashish Dev and Bo Qian argue that while the criticism is justified for some securitisation structures, there was a basis for assigning AAA ratings in others based on models used under Basel II

risk-090201-35-gif

Collateralised debt obligations (CDOs) have earned a bad reputation over the past 18 months. Since the credit crisis began in earnest in August 2007, financial institutions have suffered billions of dollars in mark-to-market losses on CDOs backed by tranches of residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBSs), which in turn were referenced to pools of subprime mortgages. Some of these CDOs were backed by cash securities, while others were referenced to credit default swaps on super-senior tranches

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here