Illiquidity holding back CCDS, despite Basel III endorsement

Where is the liquidity?

mannequin-on-strings

The new Basel III capital charge for credit value adjustment (CVA) has been subject to bitter criticism since it was first mooted at the end of 2009 – and despite one significant overhaul to the capital calculation formula and a few additional tweaks here and there, that criticism has continued. One key complaint has been that the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has opted to play it safe: its formula is more conservative and more simplistic than the models banks use internally to measure

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: