Falling short

130/30 funds have entered the limelight on both sides of the Atlantic over the past year. However, some suggest the format is not all it's cracked up to be, and that it involves additional risks that long-only investors and managers might find difficult to deal with. Mark Pengelly investigates

risk-0608-24-gif

130/30 funds are seemingly the new darlings of the asset management industry, generating a tide of enthusiasm and investment inflows over the past 18 months. Perceived as an evolution on traditional long-only investment products, the funds are mostly long, yet incorporate a 30% short portfolio that is used to finance an additional 30% leveraged long exposure. They fit into a spectrum of what are perhaps more properly termed short extension strategies, with 120/20 and 140/40 products also on the

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here