
China relaxes RMB derivatives market
The new PBOC regulations say that banks with spot foreign exchange and derivatives licenses can apply to the PBOC to conduct RMB forward transactions. Those given approval to conduct RMB forwards can then register with the State Administration of Foreign Exchange (Safe) to engage in cross-currency swap transactions, so long as these do not involve the exchange of interest rates. It is estimated that over 130 domestic and foreign banks could qualify to apply for permission to offer RMB forwards and swaps.
Approval to trade RMB forwards on a trial basis was first given to the Bank of China in 1997, and the pilot programme was subsequently extended to the other three big Chinese banks – Agricultural Bank of China, China Construction Bank and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC). Early this year, Safe extended the approval to three more banks, namely China Merchants Bank, Bank of Communications and Citic Industrial Bank.
RMB forward contracts were initially designed exclusively for trade-related purposes. But the new PBOC regulations extend the use of RMB forwards for purposes of repaying foreign borrowings in and outside of China, converting returns from investments abroad, proceeds from overseas listing and other foreign income registered with Safe.
RMB forwards are currently limited to six and 12 months, and the RMB cross-currency swaps would be based on the same tenors. The regulations say the cross-currency swaps can be offered for trade-related purposes, as well as for converting returns on overseas investments, listing and other approved income. Banks, however, cannot offer cross-currency swaps for repayment of foreign borrowings.
One banker in China said that the PBOC and CBRC have also been in discussion with banks over plans to allow them to conduct interest rate swap transactions. “The interest rate swaps would take longer, as the regulators are talking to banks to try and address the risk management issues,” the banker says.
One issue that foreign banks face in offering RMB forwards and swaps is their limited access to the local currency, bankers say. Unlike the Chinese banks, which have over $200 million in average daily trading volume of RMB/US dollar spot trades, foreign banks are restricted in terms of their branch licences and scope of renminbi businesses. For example, HSBC has the biggest foreign bank presence in China with 10 branches. In contrast, ICBC has over 8,000 branches throughout China.
However, Safe is considering various ways to enable foreign banks to access RMB for settling forward contracts. “It is still not certain how it’ll work. Perhaps one way would be to allow foreign banks to do another forward to hedge the position. The regulators are looking at different ways of doing it,” says the Chinese banker.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Credit derivatives
Single-name CDS trading bounces back
Volumes are up as Covid-driven support fuels opportunity for traders and investors
Podcast: Richard Martin on improving credit migration models
Star quant proposes a new model for predicting changes in bond ratings
CME to pass on Ice CDS administration charges
Clearing house to hike CDS index trade fees from July after Ice’s determinations committee takeover
Buy side fuels boom in single-name CDS clearing
Ice single-name CDS volumes double year on year following switch to semi-annual rolls
Ice to clear single-name bank CDSs from April 10
US participants will be able to start clearing CDSs referencing Ice clearing members
iHeart CDS saga sparks debate over credit rules
Trigger decision highlights product's weaknesses, warns Milbank’s Williams
TLAC-driven CDS index change tipped for September
UK and Swiss bank Holdco CDSs likely inclusions in next iTraxx index roll, say strategists
Fears that bumper coupon could skew iHeart CDS payouts
Market pushes for change to auction date amid fears of reduced single-name and index CDS payouts