US funds piled on index hedges ahead of stock selloff
Counterparty Radar: Filings show managers adding more than $5.5 billion of puts in Q3, setting new high
US mutual funds were positioning for an equity market selloff in the third quarter of last year, as climbing inflation increased pressure on the Federal Reserve to taper its bond-buying programme and hike rates.
Managers added over $5.5 billion of bought index puts – setting a new high-water mark – according to an analysis of the sector’s regulatory filings. By the end of the third quarter, the total notional value of bought puts stood at $64.7 billion, up from the $59.2 billion book reported in the prior quarter.
While the sector’s bearish put options position was growing, bullish bought calls shrank to $5.5 billion from $11.9 billion in Q2.
The data is compiled from filings made to the US Securities and Exchange Commission that have been gathered and analysed by Risk.net’s Counterparty Radar service. The data series covers the seven quarters from the start of 2020. Filings made between July 1 and September 30 last year were aggregated to create the third-quarter ranking, with each filing providing a snapshot of positions on the funds’ books. Notional values are not included in the filings, so had to be inferred by combining the number of contracts and number of shares per contract, then adjusting the result by the reported strike – the methodology is described below (see box: About this data).
Mutual funds mostly held options on the S&P 500, reflecting the dominance of US asset managers among SEC-regulated mutual funds. In total, the notional value of all S&P options hit $119 billion in Q3, up from $110.8 billion in Q2.
Managers also increased their holdings of Nikkei 225 and Russell 2000 options but cut their Euro Stoxx 50 and Nasdaq 100 positions.
Calamos reported the largest index options book, with roughly $16 billion in total notional. The Illinois-based manager added $3.5 billion to its book compared to Q2, surpassing Gateway Investment Advisers and Columbia Threadneedle, where reported positions were roughly flat.
Calamos also reported the quarter’s two biggest trades – sold calls worth $2.7 billion and $2.4, respectively, both having a September 30 expiration date.
Elsewhere, JP Morgan Asset Management’s book ballooned to $11 billion from $5.4 billion – vaulting the firm from tenth to fifth place in the ranking of managers by total book size. That’s despite the firm reporting only seven trades, or five less than the second quarter. No other manager in the top 10 registered fewer than two dozen tickets.
About this data
The information used in this analysis comes from Nport-P filings to the US Securities and Exchange Commission. This is a relatively new form, introduced at the end of 2019, which requires mutual funds and exchange-traded funds to file monthly summaries of their portfolio holdings to the SEC.
The filings include over-the-counter derivatives trades that were live at the time of the filing, and show details such as bank counterparty names, currencies, trade sizes and remaining maturity.
The forms are filed to the SEC on a monthly basis, and the regulator makes the final filing of each fund’s quarter public 60 days after the end of that period. The filings are in a structured XML form, making it possible to download and parse the data for trends.
It’s important to caveat the information. While these are pro forma regulatory filings to the SEC and should be accurate, mistakes and miscategorisations do occur. The data was cleaned and obvious errors excluded.
Notionals for equity options are not included in the filings, so have been calculated independently by Counterparty Radar. This involved multiplying the reported number of contracts by the number of shares per contract, and then multiplying this figure by the strike price.
The resulting strike-adjusted notional may differ from funds’ annual or semi-annual reports, which often use the spot price at time of filing instead of the strike. We chose to use the strike price to allow for quarter-to-quarter comparability – otherwise notional amounts might change solely due to changes in spot prices. The methodology is based on feedback from market participants, but if you have any comments please contact us, using the details below.
As the database is updated and improved periodically, data presented may not mirror information published in previous stories. Each story reflects the most accurate representation of data at the time of publication.
Information from these filings is the basis for the new Risk.net service, Counterparty Radar, which allows users to search the filings information themselves to discover the most popular dealers and most active managers for a range of OTC derivatives – the addition of single-stock and equity index options takes the number of instruments covered to eight, across four asset classes. We will track these stats every quarter, so please get in touch if something doesn’t look right, or to suggest other ways to present the data: michael.paterakis@infopro-digital.com
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Markets
India postpones IM go-live date
RBI communicated delay to initial margin rules one day before planned November 8 implementation
Clearing bottlenecks blamed for muted volumes at FMX
Regulatory hurdles and market conditions have also hampered CME rival since its September launch
JPM sees upside in blurring lines between QIS and SMAs
Hedge funds are combining their strategies with bank indexes to create new products
Hedge funds take profit on vol trades with Trump win
FX volatility drops sharply as positions unwind; rates market sees mixed reaction
Shanghai Clearing House urged to take bond collateral for FX trades
Dealers complain that feeble interest rate paid on cash margin raises cost of clearing
BofA’s e-FX rebuild pulls it closer to rivals
Deploying its equities tech stack, bank seeks to get ahead of the pack with algo and e-FX offerings
Corporates look to tackle unhedgeable inflation indexes
As inflation risks mount for corporates, some are finding their exposures are linked to niche indexes
Talking Heads 2024: All eyes on US equities
How the tech-driven S&P 500 surge has impacted thinking at five market participants