CCPs should pay twice into default waterfall, say researchers

Chicago Fed paper calls for contributions before members’ capital is tapped and after it is depleted

dollar-layers
Two-tranche model would put some CCP capital at risk before the waterfall starts to draw on the default fund

Central counterparties (CCPs) should contribute twice to the cost of covering a member default, argue researchers at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.

Financial markets analyst Rebecca Lewis and senior policy adviser John McPartland compared the order of payments in the event of default – the ‘default waterfall’ – at 17 major CCPs in the UK, EU and US in a paper due to be published in the Journal of Financial Market Infrastructures later this year. They conclude that CCPs should contribute

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: