CCPs should pay twice into default waterfall, say researchers

dollar-layers — Two-tranche model would put some CCP capital at risk before the waterfall starts to draw on the default fund

Alexander Campbell
29 Jan 2018

Tweet
Facebook
LinkedIn
Save this article
Send to
Print this page

Central counterparties (CCPs) should contribute twice to the cost of covering a member default, argue researchers at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.

Financial markets analyst Rebecca Lewis and senior policy adviser John McPartland compared the order of payments in the event of default – the ‘default waterfall’ – at 17 major CCPs in the UK, EU and US in a paper due to be published in the Journal of Financial Market Infrastructures later this year. They conclude that CCPs should contribute

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/

If you would like to purchase additional rights please email [email protected]

You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/

If you would like to purchase additional rights please email [email protected]