Huge capital savings at stake in STM swaps debate

Estimates show portfolio would generate 250% more capital in worst-case version of new margining treatment

US Federal Reserve building
The Federal Reserve and other US regulators issued guidance on new VM approach in August

Banks have found a way to slash the capital required on cleared swaps, but are now debating exactly how big the saving should be – a question that turns on the fine detail of the leverage ratio.

Analysis by software firm OpenGamma suggests the capital requirement in the worst-case scenario for the industry would be roughly two-and-a-half times greater than in the best case.

Chris Perkins, global head of over-the-counter derivatives clearing at Citi, says “a lot of banks are looking at” the

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: