
Standardised CSAs: no longer a matter of choice
Dealers again seeking simpler terms after 30% drop in non-cleared notionals
Derivatives dealers have been kidding themselves that they have a choice about whether to standardise collateral agreements, and the freedom to make their minds up at some future date.
That's only true if they are also willing to see the market wither away.
Credit support annexes (CSAs) give huge flexibility to the users of non-cleared derivatives – allowing them to specify the types of collateral they will post and how much unsecured counterparty risk they will tolerate, for example – but this freedom has a growing price tag, which varies from bank to bank. The added cost and complexity makes cleared trades more attractive, in part because valuation and margining is carried out by a central counterparty (CCP).
Market participants are finally voting with their feet. According to the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, the non-cleared market shrank in notional size by almost one third last year. That's a shocking collapse in demand for a big, mature financial product.
Crucially, the Isda analysis suggests the collapse – from around $122 trillion to $86 trillion – was not just a result of CCPs hoovering up more of the clearable universe. Firms have also been turning their backs on products that cannot be cleared, such as cross-currency swaps, swaptions and options, with notionals dropping from $83 trillion in 2014 to $65 trillion a year later.
Senior traders worry the market will lose a further 90% of its volume over the coming five years, or simply "grind to a halt" with unclearable products dying off completely.
That has lit a fire under the industry. In the final instalment of a four-part look at the future of the non-cleared market, Risk.net revealed two parallel initiatives that would unscramble CSAs and – dealers hope – shore up the market. In one, a group of the biggest banks is seeking to agree a set of restricted terms for interdealer margining as part of their preparations for the incoming non-cleared margining regime; the same terms could, in theory, later be offered to clients.
This path should have been followed earlier, one dealer source argued, calling it a "strategic error" to continue allowing full flexibility: "It was a once-in-a-generation opportunity to learn from the past 25 years of using the documents."
The second initiative is equally secretive but more intriguing. It would bring CCP-style standards – strict limits on eligible collateral, independent valuation and margining – to the non-cleared market, though with a CCP acting as an agent rather than the counterparty. LCH is said to be behind this one – the firm declined to comment – but talks are in their early stages.
Both ideas address the chief cause of the market's woes – the lack of fungibility created by today's CSAs – so could conceivably shore up volumes. But if a non-cleared trade ends up resembling a cleared trade in the way it is collateralised then it also removes one of the non-cleared products' selling points. Would it ultimately act as a bridge, speeding the passage of more products into clearing houses?
Possibly. It was certainly no surprise when Isda announced on June 9 that it is expanding its board to include two directors from the cleared derivatives market.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Markets
SG’s Ungari swaps research for structuring in new QIS role
Veteran researcher and strategist ‘putting things into action’ with new remit
Yen rates losses top $1 billion
Pay fixed, curve flattener and vol steepener positions were hit hard as yields swung wildly
Markets are mispricing tariff uncertainty, say academics
Johns Hopkins economists warn of risk from changes to the ‘rules of the game’
‘This is not a wobble’: Brunello Rosa on the path to de-dollarisation
Digital currencies will play a central role as China challenges US hegemony, says economist
Repo clearing rule could raise SOFR volatility – OFR analysts
Analysis of 2022 data finds large divergence in tail rates but no change in median
Investors dip a toe back into Tips despite April losses
US inflation-linked bonds back in vogue as stagflation hedge
Europe’s Ucits funds: Made in the USA
Counterparty Radar: EU retail funds market is a prime example of Trump’s miscalculation on trade
Goldman Sachs doubled FX trading revenues in 2024
Bumper Q4 powers bank to head of US dealer pack by foreign exchange revenue