Fed's Pykhtin: new risk measure less punitive than CEM

Capital benefits also remain intact for modelling banks, says Fed official

Michael Pykhtin

A new standardised way of modelling counterparty risk will produce higher capital numbers than internal models, according to a senior official from the Federal Reserve Board – but it will be more risk-sensitive than the two approaches it replaces, including the decades-old current exposure method (CEM). The CEM has been a bugbear for banks since regulators slotted it into a number of more recent prudential rules, including the leverage ratio.

The standardised approach to counterparty credit risk

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an indvidual account here: