
Podcast: Andrew Dickinson on CCPs’ defence mechanisms
Trades’ size limits, membership rules and more transparency key to avoid another CCP default

For this Quantcast, Risk.net spoke with Andrew Dickinson, who leads the CCP analytics group at Bank of America.
With Leif Andersen, global head of the quantitative strategies group, Dickinson developed a model to assess exposure to a central counterparty. Crucially, the model has the ability to capture wrong-way risk stemming from the presence of clearing members with outsized positions. Such positions can trigger the member’s default in the case of large, adverse market moves.
If the defaulting member has an unhedged position and is unable to meet the margin calls, the CCP’s default fund could suffer significant losses. The case of power trader Einar Aas’ default at Nasdaq Clearing in September 2018, and the default fund’s subsequent loss of $119.7 million, set alarm bells ringing for banks, CCPs and regulators.
“In our view, initial margin on its own is not a sufficient risk mitigant in isolation. It needs to be complemented by suitable controls in order to prevent members clearing outsized, unhedged positions,” says Dickinson.
The concerns of broker-dealers have been debated in meetings organised by the Futures Industry Association and the International Swaps and Derivatives Association. The message from the industry seems to be unanimous.
“We and our peers are suggesting there needs to be a strengthening of the regulation to either impose limits or stronger membership criteria, or at the very least have greater transparency,” says Dickinson, lamenting the scarcity of transparent information released at the time of Nasdaq’s default.
He explains how their previous model was extended to include a probability distribution, a Student-t, which allows for arbitrarily fat tails to model rare events. Its output is one easy-to-interpret figure that can provide precious information to all of the parties involved and help them decide how to deal with such circumstances.
Index
00:00 Intro
02:02 Central clearing vs bilateral clearing
05:05 One bad apple
07:10 What are the results in the paper?
09:40 Key components of the model
12:30 Wrong-way risk
17:00 How this model helps understanding of Einar Aas’ default at Nasdaq
19:15 What info does the model give you and how can you use it?
20:50 Who should decide to adopt this model?
23:15 Feedback from CCPs and regulators
26:20 Model’s further developments
To hear the full interview, listen in the player above, or download. Future podcasts in our Quantcast series will be uploaded to Risk.net. You can also visit the main page here to access all tracks, or go to the iTunes store or Google Podcasts to listen and subscribe.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Cutting Edge
Information geometry of risks and returns
An innovative product design framework and its geometric interpretation is introduced
Podcast: Jan Rosenzweig on fat tails and LDI portfolios
An optimised portfolio can look very different when extreme moves are given more weight
Fat tails and optimal LDI portfolios
A portfolio optimisation technique for pension funds and insurance portfolios is presented
A model for small basket equities financing
A haircut model for equity baskets based on credit and equity indexes is introduced
The carbon equivalence principle: methods for project finance
A method to price the environmental impact of financial products is proposed
Podcast: Barzykin and Guéant on FX market-making
Industry quant teams up with academics to build better risk tools for FX markets
Funding, wealth transfer and financial stability in the post-Libor era
Adjusting RFR with a funding premium may aid economic growth and stability
Dealing with multi-currency inventory risk in FX cash markets
A market-making model that considers correlation, transaction costs and market impact is presented